what bumper stickers make you want to run people off the road?

[onthebutton]

Molecular biology has made many of the arguments from above obsolete (from both sides). The high degree of coding sequence conservation between species unquestionably demonstrates that evolution isn't a theory, it's the truth.

And, you're either nuts, or really dumb. Your choice.

[Slade19]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I see a lot of posts insulting my intelligence, and not a single one offering even the slightest bit of "you're wrong, because:..."

[/ QUOTE ]

Because it's nearly impossible to argue with someone so clearly insane as you are.

[/ QUOTE ]

Again with the insanity... from someone who seems to accept the fact that your great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great (ad nauseum) grandpa was a rock that got too wet?

[MrBrightside]

[ QUOTE ]
The fish with "Darwin" inside. No matter what your beliefs are, I think this one is just dumb.

[/ QUOTE ]

Thus failing to get the irony. Evolution isn't a "belief" any more than the round earth is a belief. It's objecting to the idea that people (like you apparently) consider it a "belief" that needs to be balanced.

[Slade19]

[ QUOTE ]
Molecular biology has made many of the arguments from above obsolete (from both sides). The high degree of coding sequence conservation between species unquestionably demonstrates that evolution isn't a theory, it's the truth.

And, you're either nuts, or really dumb. Your choice.

[/ QUOTE ]

So because the DNA is similar, they must have evolved from a common ancestor? Is there even a remote possibility that the DNA is similar because ... there was a common DESIGNER?

A Taurus and a Sable are very similar... does that mean they both evolved from a Civic 500 million years ago?

You think my example is stupid? Well it's essentially what you're telling me.

[FortunaMaximus]

I want to hear more about this Solar System that's older than the Universe though.

[NT!]

[ QUOTE ]
I want to hear more about this Solar System that's older than the Universe though.

[/ QUOTE ]

sorry too late

[FortunaMaximus]

Dang. Seaweed's a helluva drug.

[jaffa]

[ QUOTE ]
I see a lot of posts insulting my intelligence, and not a single one offering even the slightest bit of "you're wrong, because:..."

Doesn't have to be a long explanation.

I can do it in single sentences/phrases.

Macro Evolution is religious because:...

-It hasn't been observed, nor has it been duplicated.
-One word: eyes
-Two words: Elemental "evolution" (Please tell me how you get uranium by "evolving" hydrogen)
-Rocks date the fossils in one museum, and the fossils date the rocks in another.
-The precious "geolocic column" which macro evolution is based on is found NOWHERE on the planet.
-Polonium Halos <a href="www.halos.com" target="_blank">Link</a>
-Countless human artifacts found inside seams of coal (timeline problem for evolutionists) [url=http://paleo.cc/paluxy/hammer.htm]Link[url] (One example)
-Ica stones Link
-Trilobite eyes Link
-Trilobite found squashed underneath fossilized human sandal print Link
-Human footprints found in countless dinosaur footprints. Link
-Haekel's fake embryonic drawingsLink
-Archaeoraptor Liaoningensis: Fake Dinosaur-bird ancestor [url=http://www.nwcreation.net/evolutionfraud.html]Link[/link]
-Archaeopteryx (Not to be confused with Archaeoraptor) the perching bird labeled as a dinosaur. Link
-The countless so-called "vestigal" parts.

The list goes on...


And to the guy who says humans are poorly designed? Example?

[/ QUOTE ]


You're absolutely right. Clearly the only explanation for the existance of anything is some celestial bearded guy knocking it all up in a week.


Back to bumper stickers i say.

[wacki]

I really don't have time to debunk everything in your list, but I will attack one obvious flaw:

[ QUOTE ]
-One word: eyes

[/ QUOTE ]

The human eye is horribly designed. In fact it's design makes little or no sense unless you include evolution. (a history of which would require 30 pages of text) The wires of the eye start from the inside, run OVER the optical sensors (makes ZERO sense unless you knew the evolutionary history), and then runs out the hole which gives us a blind spot. Other animals do not have this horrible design. The optic sensors are in front of the wires. Other animals have a very clean design and no blind spot. If god designed us, why did he give us one of the worst designed set of eyes in the animal kingdom?

Darwin has some more thoughts on the human eye:
http://www.literature.org/authors/da...hapter-06.html

Please keep in mind I'm not saying god doesn't exist. I'm simply saying that I highly doubt god designed the human body. We have so many flaws it's unbelievable.

[NT!]

wacki...

come on man. this is OOT. stop. just stop.

if you wish to settle the debate over whether a benevolent god exists, and whether he wants us to be happy, i submit the following.