Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: My new girl friend is hung on this simultaneous orgasm thing and last night I just thought wtf and f
I didn't know women had orgasms 23 11.39%
no I just knock it out when I do 87 43.07%
yes, anything for the ladies 57 28.22%
yes, then I beat one out later 35 17.33%
Voters: 202. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-28-2006, 11:14 AM
Skuzzy Skuzzy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Having Fun!
Posts: 746
Default Poker Truism?

Quick quiz question. How true is the following:


If I raise a TAG Villain (with no other reads) on a wet flop and he pushes for considerably more than a PSR, I expect to see a big draw most of the time.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-28-2006, 11:20 AM
Dan Bitel Dan Bitel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bork! Bork! Bork!
Posts: 11,164
Default Re: Poker Truism?

<50%
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-28-2006, 11:44 AM
Ratamahatta Ratamahatta is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: CPH-Denmark
Posts: 2,733
Default Re: Poker Truism?

Very few players push their draws at SSNL.

Edit: bad shortstacks do it often, but they push with bottom pair very often as well.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-28-2006, 11:57 AM
Skuzzy Skuzzy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Having Fun!
Posts: 746
Default Re: Poker Truism?

I posted this because in the last few days I have seen this happen 20+ times and all but twice the TAG pusher was on a draw.

Unfortunately, I no longer have stats due to this sites policy of email requests only for HH and then they are unsupported by poker tracker so I cant check. Hence, this post, to see if this was anonomolous or a reflection of TAG play in general.
My feeling was that avergage TAGs know to push there draws (often incorrectly with too few outs), but don't make this play with their made hands, preferring to try and extract value.

This could also be a reflection of the games here - generally nitty.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-28-2006, 11:58 AM
Paul Thomson Paul Thomson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: donking it up NL200
Posts: 3,589
Default Re: Poker Truism?

are we assuming a raised preflop pot? stacks? blah blah blah.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-28-2006, 12:11 PM
Skuzzy Skuzzy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Having Fun!
Posts: 746
Default Re: Poker Truism?

[ QUOTE ]
are we assuming a raised preflop pot? stacks? blah blah blah.

[/ QUOTE ]

I was trying to avoid narrowing this down too much. Situations I was considering included limped and raised pots, standard (100BB) to deep stacks. The key factor was a TAG pushing on a board that if the player was LAG you might think he'd hit a pat hand. [censored]. Maybe I [censored] up the question trying to suggest a 'general principle' that was actually much more specific.

Regardless, assume nothing, go with your gut. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-28-2006, 12:14 PM
Vincent Vincent is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Whoa Nellie
Posts: 1,355
Default Re: Poker Truism?

I would assume that a TAG usually raised PF, so <50%. Mostly I'd assume PP (be it overpairs or sets).
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.