Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Beats, Brags, and Variance
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 09-24-2006, 11:47 PM
ZBTHorton ZBTHorton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: SSNL Coaches PM ME!!
Posts: 6,587
Default Re: So they tell you NL as less variance...

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
can you combine the two graphs? i wanna see what it looks like.

[/ QUOTE ]



[/ QUOTE ]


ugh it looks like you are a pretty successful poker player

[/ QUOTE ]

This graph looks A LOT like a graph I had a while back where AA-99 (yeah all of them) were losing money for me. Maybe you are running bad with big pairs or overplaying them?

[/ QUOTE ]

To be honest, I was down money with KK through like 60K hands this month, and am only up a little now.

With the exception of AA, my winrate for each pair is down in comparison tothe month before it.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 09-25-2006, 01:27 AM
beset beset is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: anarchocapistan
Posts: 3,977
Default Re: So they tell you NL as less variance...

That graph looks very spikey for 200nl. I have had a few long break-even stretches playing 1/2 and 2/4 but your play looks very violatile compared to mine. What is your sd/100? I think you should play with 50bb stacks for a while. jmo.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 09-25-2006, 01:32 AM
NoahSD NoahSD is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,925
Default Re: So they tell you NL as less variance...

ZBT,
Have you tried showing people whole like 500-hand sessions? It's possible that you have major leaks in hands that you think are boring.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 09-25-2006, 01:33 AM
samster samster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: the sizzuh
Posts: 794
Default Re: So they tell you NL as less variance...

[ QUOTE ]
still up 15 grand. for most people thats like half their yearly pay or close to it.


[/ QUOTE ]

Is this true?
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 09-25-2006, 01:43 AM
tilted tilted is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: tilting nits
Posts: 147
Default Re: So they tell you NL as less variance...

this is not variance, it's you
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 09-25-2006, 01:43 AM
Sponger. Sponger. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 19,136
Default Re: So they tell you NL as less variance...

ZBT,

I thought you bragged about making 100k a year a few days ago?
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 09-25-2006, 01:50 AM
Spechel EDD Spechel EDD is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: crUNKviLLE
Posts: 9,665
Default Re: So they tell you NL as less variance...

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
still up 15 grand. for most people thats like half their yearly pay or close to it.


[/ QUOTE ]

Is this true?

[/ QUOTE ]

sorry i was off and basing my statement off past census facts

http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/...th/002484.html

[ QUOTE ]
Real median household income remained unchanged between 2002 and 2003 in three of the four census regions — Northeast ($46,742), Midwest ($44,732) and West ($46,820). The exception was the South, where income declined 1.5 percent. The South continued to have the lowest median household income of all four regions ($39,823). The difference between median household incomes in the Northeast and West was not statistically significant.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 09-25-2006, 01:58 AM
ZBTHorton ZBTHorton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: SSNL Coaches PM ME!!
Posts: 6,587
Default Re: So they tell you NL as less variance...

[ QUOTE ]
ZBT,

I thought you bragged about making 100k a year a few days ago?

[/ QUOTE ]

I am still well on pace to make 100K this year.

This is 3 months. Not to mention 15K + Rakeback = 22K or so. x 4 = 88K. So even if I repeated this every three months I'd still almost make 100K
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 09-25-2006, 01:59 AM
dibbs dibbs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 3,203
Default Re: So they tell you NL as less variance...

Owwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww.

I am very familiar with the long stretches where you start to feel no matter what hand you have you cant win, but 90k is crazy, I thought 100k hands with my current winrate was the "longrun," now Im worried. I guess it doesnt matter much though given the probabilities of pending legislation.

I dont know how you do it man, Id quit after that much, Im
lucky if I clock a 60 hour month though, you have a good work ethic.

PM me if you wanna swap AIM names, Ill look at hands or whatever, is this 6max or no?
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 09-25-2006, 02:04 AM
Sponger. Sponger. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 19,136
Default Re: So they tell you NL as less variance...

[ QUOTE ]
I am still well on pace to make 100K this year.


[/ QUOTE ]

Yes but how much will you lose?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.