Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-27-2006, 04:51 PM
midwestkc midwestkc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 521
Default differences between .5/1 and 1/2

So, after about 8k hands at .5/1 with about a 3.3BB/100 winner, I decide to give 1/2 a shot to clear some bonuses quicker. I finish 1 prima bonus at 1/2 and have a decent session. I then decide to move on to absolute. Wow. I'm getting killed here and I'm wondering if this is a bigger jump than what I expected, if it's the players at absolute, or what...

So on to my question - What are the differences between these levels, and is it a big jump, etc? FWIW, I'm currently losing 4.5BB/100 over a miniscule 1k hands. I know it's too early to tell, and I have the BR for it, I'm just being a little girl about it.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-27-2006, 04:55 PM
Dunkman Dunkman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bubbling FTs
Posts: 2,584
Default Re: differences between .5/1 and 1/2

Honestly I think it has as much to do with moving to absolute as it does moving from .50/1 to 1/2. The 1/2 full ring games at absolute have a reputation for being very tough.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-27-2006, 04:57 PM
midwestkc midwestkc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 521
Default Re: differences between .5/1 and 1/2

good to know...maybe I'll grind out about 10 million hands at .5/1 to clear my $300 bonus then. Are they exceptionally tough as well?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-27-2006, 05:04 PM
k000k k000k is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: shrike
Posts: 951
Default Re: differences between .5/1 and 1/2

If we're talking about full 10 handed ring games, then IMO, .5/1 is loose weak players. 1/2 is tighter weak players. I think the 1/2 game is harder than the 2/4 game. My bb/100 thinks so too.

If we're talking about 6-max, then the .5/1 is ridiculously easy, and the 1/2 is just kinda easy.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-27-2006, 05:20 PM
Dunkman Dunkman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bubbling FTs
Posts: 2,584
Default Re: differences between .5/1 and 1/2

I don't think they're as bad...Absolute has a reputation for tough games anyway...and the 1/2 game seems to kinda be the sweet spot for grinding out their bonus (you need 100 raked hands with at least a .50 rake per $10 of bonus), so the 1/2 is the lowest limit where you can effectively grind out the bonus. As such, there's a lot of good players there grinding out bonuses. I'm not sure of the % of raked hands per 100 at absolute, but I'd think the bonus is covering a substantial part of your -4.5BB/100, so maybe play some more and see if it was variance. I mean, in the end they're 1/2 games, it's not like they're impossible.

As for me, I'm at the Party beginner's tables until for another 4 weeks, so my idea of a tough game atm is less than 5 to a flop for 2 hands in a row.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.