Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 09-06-2006, 05:14 PM
Mr_Donktastic Mr_Donktastic is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: hu4rollz.com
Posts: 3,807
Default Re: 3/6 Party -- AK oop -- should I have fired again on turn?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Villain hasn't played much in 4-5 orbits, therefore you have to assume he's a tight player and got a piece of the flop, probably top pair or top two pair.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think this is a terrible assumption to make. All villian did was limp preflop, call a raise and call a bet on the flop. There is no reason to put him on top pair or top two - he could have an underpair or a str8 draw for all we know.


[/ QUOTE ]
Ryan,

I don't really think it's a stretch to assume villian is tight. With 8 players at the table, 4-5 orbits is 32-40 hands, and if he's only played 5-6 hands he's under 20% VPIP. If my read on villian is correct that he's tight and possibly passive (which isn't a stretch since he didn't raise on any street), then being UTG with QJ or QT offsuit is a hand he'd probably limp with since these are maginal hands from this position seeking to hit a big flop. Which possibly villain has done.

Adam

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree that suited broadway are in his range but where are you getting this info from? Played 5 or 6 hands? Has vpip under 20? Is tight/passive?

Either I'm missing something or you are making all of this up.

This is all OP said:

No stats on Villain. He's been at the table for 4-5 orbits, hasn't played too many hands and hasn't done anything too provocative yet.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-19-2006, 01:19 PM
You're No Daisy You're No Daisy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pinning the tail on the donkey
Posts: 482
Default Re: 3/6 Party -- AK oop -- should I have fired again on turn?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Villain hasn't played much in 4-5 orbits, therefore you have to assume he's a tight player and got a piece of the flop, probably top pair or top two pair.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think this is a terrible assumption to make. All villian did was limp preflop, call a raise and call a bet on the flop. There is no reason to put him on top pair or top two - he could have an underpair or a str8 draw for all we know.


[/ QUOTE ]
Ryan,

I don't really think it's a stretch to assume villian is tight. With 8 players at the table, 4-5 orbits is 32-40 hands, and if he's only played 5-6 hands he's under 20% VPIP. If my read on villian is correct that he's tight and possibly passive (which isn't a stretch since he didn't raise on any street), then being UTG with QJ or QT offsuit is a hand he'd probably limp with since these are maginal hands from this position seeking to hit a big flop. Which possibly villain has done.

Adam

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree that suited broadway are in his range but where are you getting this info from? Played 5 or 6 hands? Has vpip under 20? Is tight/passive?

Either I'm missing something or you are making all of this up.

This is all OP said:

No stats on Villain. He's been at the table for 4-5 orbits, hasn't played too many hands and hasn't done anything too provocative yet.

[/ QUOTE ]
Ryan,

You just made my point. Villain hasn't played too many hands in 4-5 orbits. At an 8 person table, 4 orbits is 32 hands, 5 orbits is 40 hands. So lets make an educated guess that not playing too many hands means 5-6 hands not including the SB & BB. Either way, when we don't include the blinds, that gives villain a VPIP under 20% which most poker tracking software would consider tight. The fact that the OP said villain hasn't done anything "too provocative" would lead me to believe he's a little passive. So I'm not making things up, I'm just going on what little information I have from this post.

Adam
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-19-2006, 01:45 PM
raze raze is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,561
Default Re: 3/6 Party -- AK oop -- should I have fired again on turn?

I think simply if you're going to check/call the turn, you might as well bet it. Getting raised is not a huge problem @ 7-1 odds with two overcards + a gutshot to the nuts.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-19-2006, 03:13 PM
Xhad Xhad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: .25/.50 6max - stars
Posts: 5,289
Default Re: 3/6 Party -- AK oop -- should I have fired again on turn?

When I'm the aggressor I almost never check the turn with AK UI but if I'm going to do it this is the type of board to do it on. Either way I am not calling the river; it's possible he missed a straight but it's also very possible he would give up bluffing it after you called the turn.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-21-2006, 10:53 AM
You're No Daisy You're No Daisy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pinning the tail on the donkey
Posts: 482
Default Re: 3/6 Party -- AK oop -- should I have fired again on turn?

[ QUOTE ]
I think simply if you're going to check/call the turn, you might as well bet it. Getting raised is not a huge problem @ 7-1 odds with two overcards + a gutshot to the nuts.

[/ QUOTE ]
Our Hero is on the Turn. He is getting 7:1 pot odds to make an 11:1 draw. Betting here is not a good line. Check call the Turn and fold to a bet on the River.

Adam
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.