Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Gambling > Probability
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 09-16-2006, 04:15 PM
SpaceAce SpaceAce is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,017
Default Re: I think it\'s obvious

[ QUOTE ]
I don't understand the odds they gave. Is that the odds of buying a single ticket for one lottery then buying a second ticket for a second lottery and winning both?

Clearly if the odds of one person winning two lotteries is ~3.6 trillion to one, its unlikely that she's the 3rd person to have done this.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'd love to see someone do the math for having three two-time winners in the New York State Lottery assuming everyone in the state (using the current population) bought exactly two tickets since the inception of the game.

SpaceAce
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-18-2006, 02:35 PM
elitegimp elitegimp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 515
Default Re: I think it\'s obvious

[ QUOTE ]

I'd love to see someone do the math for having three two-time winners in the New York State Lottery assuming everyone in the state (using the current population) bought exactly two tickets since the inception of the game.

SpaceAce

[/ QUOTE ]

Population (2005): 19,254,630 [source]

I'm guessing you actually want the probability of at least 3 2-time winners, but I'm also guessing that the difference is negligable. Just in case, I'll do both (:

1) Exactly 3 winners. Using the numbers quoted in the article, let p = Probability of winning = 1/3,669,120,000,000

The probability of exactly 3 winners is C(population, 3)*p^3*(1-p)^(population-3), or approximately 1 in 1.415*1^16 (that's 14,151,775,022,528,610). At least, according to matlab.

2) p0 = probability of no two-time winners = (1-p)^population = 0.99999475197658


p1 = probability of one two-time winner =
population*p*(1-p)^(population-1) = 5.2477 * 10^-6 (1 in 190,000)

p2 = probability of two two-time winners =
0.5*population*(population-1)*p^2*(1-p)^(population-2) = 1.37*10^-11 (1 in 72,000,000)

probability of at least 3 = 1 - p0 - p1 - p2 = ~1 in 3.5 billion

this is an indication that rounding error is messing up my calculations, and I'm not sure which to believe... I'm using Matlab for all these calculations, which I believe uses double precision. As curious as I am, I'm not gonna roll my own structure for better precision (:
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-18-2006, 05:23 PM
BruceZ BruceZ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,078
Default Re: I think it\'s obvious

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

I'd love to see someone do the math for having three two-time winners in the New York State Lottery assuming everyone in the state (using the current population) bought exactly two tickets since the inception of the game.

SpaceAce

[/ QUOTE ]

Population (2005): 19,254,630 [source]

I'm guessing you actually want the probability of at least 3 2-time winners, but I'm also guessing that the difference is negligable. Just in case, I'll do both (:

1) Exactly 3 winners. Using the numbers quoted in the article, let p = Probability of winning = 1/3,669,120,000,000

The probability of exactly 3 winners is C(population, 3)*p^3*(1-p)^(population-3), or approximately 1 in 1.415*1^16 (that's 14,151,775,022,528,610). At least, according to matlab.

2) p0 = probability of no two-time winners = (1-p)^population = 0.99999475197658


p1 = probability of one two-time winner =
population*p*(1-p)^(population-1) = 5.2477 * 10^-6 (1 in 190,000)

p2 = probability of two two-time winners =
0.5*population*(population-1)*p^2*(1-p)^(population-2) = 1.37*10^-11 (1 in 72,000,000)

probability of at least 3 = 1 - p0 - p1 - p2 = ~1 in 3.5 billion

this is an indication that rounding error is messing up my calculations, and I'm not sure which to believe... I'm using Matlab for all these calculations, which I believe uses double precision. As curious as I am, I'm not gonna roll my own structure for better precision (:

[/ QUOTE ]

Believe the first method, except you have an extra 1 at the beginning (1 in 4.15*10^16, not 1 in 1.415*10^16). In the second method, you are subtracting a number just less than 1 from 1 and losing significant figures. Then you continue to subtract numbers that are almost equal to each other until all the digits remaining are garbage.

The actual result for >=3 is almost the same as for exactly 3. You can get the right order of magnitude "in your head" as follows:

The population is about 20 million, and the probability of winning twice is about 1 in 4*10^12.

C(20*10^6,3)* 1/(4*10^12)^3

=~ 8*10^21/6/(6*10^37)

=~ 2/9 * 10^-16

=~ 2 * 10^-17
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.