Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-25-2006, 01:47 AM
ShineOn ShineOn is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 99
Default AQo in BB

MP2 is a TAG, CO is LAG, and SB Loose/Passive

Party Poker 2/4 Hold'em (9 handed) FTR converter on zerodivide.cx

Preflop: Hero is BB with Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">MP2 raises</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, CO calls, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, SB calls, Hero calls.

Flop: (8 SB) 3[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font>
SB checks, Here checks , MP2 checks, <font color="#CC3333">CO bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">SB raises</font>, Hero ?

I was plannning on C/R the TAG. My plan failed, but I was still going to get in my C/R when the CO bet. When the SB C/R I am completely torn between a 3 bet and folding.

Thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-25-2006, 01:52 AM
Clarkmeister Clarkmeister is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: THATSATOOMANY!!!!
Posts: 17,935
Default Re: AQo in BB

I don't think it's 3-bet or fold. I think it's 3-bet or call. PFR checking means he's giving up, you don't have to worry about him. He's got some middling pair and is gone. CO is a lag, so not only does his flop bet mean little, you also aren't going to get him to fold anything for 2 more bets that you want to fold. 3-betting is ok, but not mandatory. I'd slightly lean towards cold-calling and seeing what the action is like behind you. Your hand will be well disguised and you maintain the option to raise the turn if you still desire.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-25-2006, 02:02 AM
ShineOn ShineOn is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 99
Default Re: AQo in BB

you are right, i should not have ruled out a cold call. the CO bet did not worry me, it was the passive SB C/R that worried me.

If I was goign to play the hand, I wanted more information pre-flop if I was going to get stuck between a check-raiser and a LAG. That is why I was considering a 3-bet
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-25-2006, 02:05 AM
Clarkmeister Clarkmeister is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: THATSATOOMANY!!!!
Posts: 17,935
Default Re: AQo in BB

Even passive players will checkraise a lag in a big pot.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-25-2006, 02:14 AM
ShineOn ShineOn is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 99
Default Re: AQo in BB

Ok, I think you have talked me into a call with an evaluation/possible C/R on the turn.

Now, what about my check that got me into this mess? Is this a standard place to be thinking C/R, even though it most likely wont protect my hand based on the PFR position?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-25-2006, 03:46 AM
MCS MCS is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Brooklyn! What!
Posts: 5,447
Default Re: AQo in BB

C/R is fine. You can't protect your hand by betting, so the c/r attempt is a good idea. Got kinda weird though, eh? [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

I call and see what happens after I check the turn. If you're ahead, the opponents have very few outs. If it's two cold to me on a bad turn, I fold.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-25-2006, 04:37 AM
Misja Misja is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 227
Default Re: AQo in BB

I think SB will only have a Q most of the time. Therefore I like 3-betting to get more money in the pot. If SB caps then it's time to slow down.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-25-2006, 07:10 AM
bambi bambi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 525
Default Re: AQo in BB

3 bet all day long
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-25-2006, 01:31 PM
MRBAA MRBAA is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: New York City \'burbs
Posts: 2,796
Default Re: AQo in BB

I think there's also a strong case for the three bet -- the raiser may well have a hand like KQ, the LAG may well have less. So why not pound it and see what transpires. If the LAG folds, you can play the SB with position. If he caps and bets the turn (and the turn doesn't help) you can probably fold in peace if he's really a passive sort who wouldn't get aggro with less than two pair (didn't count the pot, if you're getting 8-1 or better on a turn call you can call planning to fold the river unimproved). If you are checked to on the turn, you can bet and take a free one on the river, or bet again for value depending on what falls and your read. That's how I'd play it.

But I agree that calling is also very viable here -- and that folding is not an option.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-26-2006, 04:03 PM
GMMigge GMMigge is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Landskrona, Sweden
Posts: 688
Default Re: AQo in BB

[ QUOTE ]
C/R is fine. You can't protect your hand by betting, so the c/r attempt is a good idea.

[/ QUOTE ]

[img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] How can a checkraise be a better attempt to protect our hand? The likely bettor is on our immediate left; if the TAG bets and it's called around to us, a checkraise won't accomplish much.

Isn't donking a better option, hoping that the TAG raises?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.