|
|
#1
09-08-2006, 02:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
NCAA Bar Stool Pundits, Week 2
Troy Smith vs. some no-name Vince Young replacement? Don't be silly, it's not even gonna be close. Sure, the game is in Austin, but how much does home-field advantage really matter any way?
Over 58% of people at ESPN.com are picking Ohio State to win straight up. And they're 2.5 point dogs! Yet somehow the line is staying relatively constant. I don't know about you, but I'll be on Texas -2.5 (-103). 
|
|
#4
09-08-2006, 05:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NCAA Bar Stool Pundits, Week 2
I love the idea of BSPs but I'm just not feeling it for this game.
|
|
#5
09-08-2006, 06:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NCAA Bar Stool Pundits, Week 2
I don't think BSP works as well for college games. The lines are just so bad to begin with that a lot of times, the reasonably informed public can figure it out. This reminds me a lot of the O/U with Miami/FSU last week. Everyone thought it was "too obvious" that the game was gonna go under. Well, guess what? The under covered by 17 points.
|
|
#7
09-08-2006, 07:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NCAA Bar Stool Pundits, Week 2
[ QUOTE ]
I don't think BSP works as well for college games. The lines are just so bad to begin with that a lot of times, the reasonably informed public can figure it out. This reminds me a lot of the O/U with Miami/FSU last week. Everyone thought it was "too obvious" that the game was gonna go under. Well, guess what? The under covered by 17 points. [/ QUOTE ] right on I don't like BSP's for NCAAF
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
