#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Full ring gossip
But it suites your 14/7 nit style really well.
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Full ring gossip
i dont have a big enough sample yet, but i think 3-5 ptBB/100 is sustainable for me at 5-10 8-10tabling...i'm no KKF/other sick HSNL guys though. (is KKF considered a full ring player now?)
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Full ring gossip
um, variance is lower at 6m, more hands played so less variance, and yes, 6m multitabling takes a lot more concentration than fullring because your range is wider and you get more hands, so you have to be playing a few hands at once rather than maybe 2 hands across 8 tables
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Full ring gossip
FR has far less variance. More hands being played ("your range is wider) = more situations which = more variance. Your "more hands played" argument seems to be a misdirected version of the argument that when you play more hands, you go through variance faster.
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Full ring gossip
[ QUOTE ]
i dont have a big enough sample yet, but i think 3-5 ptBB/100 is sustainable for me at 5-10 8-10tabling...i'm no KKF/other sick HSNL guys though. (is KKF considered a full ring player now?) [/ QUOTE ] Thats what I was guessing is sustainable. I am still improving at full ring and I am 3/100 so Im guessing the very good guys can do 5/100. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Full ring gossip
I may try full ring again once I get a little better at flopping top set... still learning
NT |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Full ring gossip
EricSjodin = ERIK_87 too
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Full ring gossip
that makes sense.
|
|
|