![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
no reads at all???
UTG: AA/KK AK AQ AJ 44 maybe CO: A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]x[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] AK/AQ/A4/44 Maybe AA/KK/QQ/JJ/53 if hes really bad UTG should Call with anything better than AJ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
should of anticipated less people replying here. bump?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Next time you do this post some reads.
UTG has an A, most likely A9s+, or 44/KK/AA CO has a weaker Ace, set, 2pr w/A, or suited connector with busted FD. UTG should call with anything he has up to this point. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
should of anticipated less people replying here. bump? [/ QUOTE ] you have to give the thread more than 10 minutes before you start bumping... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
no reads or stats at all and almost full ring, then this really could be any two unless their solid no read players, the hypothetical is quite interesting but i do believe that this is just wayy too broad, unless your implying EVERYONE plays ten table mechanical poker, like a large majority of players here on the forum, if either player is lag, especially the CO then he could have a9s + any two spades, 44 or A4s, and a couple overpairs if he just can t fold KK or QQ UTG obviously more tight, but i make moves from uTG at tight tables
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sorry for no reads but just give your answer assuming both unknowns.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Given no reads, I put UTG on AQ/AJ, and CO on a busted FD, with the outside possibility of A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]. I think there is a high possibility that this is a bluff, and UTG should call given his range above.
|
![]() |
|
|