|
|
#1
09-03-2006, 03:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Sick call with 4 high at $500/$1000 HU
First of all, I'm not this guy. I've come across this hand at a Swedish poker forum and it caused quite a fight between people who think this must be a misclick and some who think pot odds and a strong read justified a call. There was even some comments from TexasLimitKing himself where he said that he knew what he was doing after playing a lot of HU against this guy.
So, I would very much like to have some comments on this from people who play HU at similar levels. Can this call ever be justified? Full Tilt Poker Game #928921427: Table Tiger (heads up) - $500/$1000 - Limit Hold'em - 23:43:26 ET - 2006/08/23 Seat 1: eastsideslim ($113,579) Seat 2: TexasLimitKing ($53,004) TexasLimitKing posts the small blind of $250 eastsideslim posts the big blind of $500 The button is in seat #2 *** HOLE CARDS *** TexasLimitKing raises to $1,000 eastsideslim calls $500 *** FLOP *** [Qc 2d 6h] eastsideslim checks TexasLimitKing bets $500 helstock (Observer): slim u r sick eastsideslim raises to $1,000 TexasLimitKing calls $500 *** TURN *** [Qc 2d 6h] [Qs] eastsideslim bets $1,000 TexasLimitKing calls $1,000 helstock (Observer): killing tex *** RIVER *** [Qc 2d 6h Qs] [6d] eastsideslim bets $1,000 TexasLimitKing calls $1,000 *** SHOW DOWN *** eastsideslim shows [3s 3d] (two pair, Queens and Sixes) TexasLimitKing shows [4d 4c] (two pair, Queens and Sixes) TexasLimitKing wins the pot ($7,999.50) with two pair, Queens and Sixes *** SUMMARY *** Total pot $8,000 | Rake $0.50 Board: [Qc 2d 6h Qs 6d] Seat 1: eastsideslim (big blind) showed [3s 3d] and lost with two pair, Queens and Sixes Seat 2: TexasLimitKing (small blind) showed [4d 4c] and won ($7,999.50) with two pair, Queens and Sixes Dealer: Hand #928923156 Dealer: eastsideslim has 15 seconds left to act eastsideslim: wtf Dealer: eastsideslim has timed out Dealer: TexasLimitKing wins the pot ($500) eastsideslim: u can only beat one hand eastsideslim: how can u call with 44 eastsideslim: board QQ662 eastsideslim: i have 33 eastsideslim: i dont like that eastsideslim: something not right TexasLimitKing: just continue eastsideslim: how can u call with 44 TexasLimitKing: im not g oing to tell u how i play poker or read u eastsideslim: im done eastsideslim: u made a lot of good reads eastsideslim: but thats just impossible TexasLimitKing: apparently not eastsideslim: only 1 hand u can beat TexasLimitKing: yes eastsideslim: not 22 eastsideslim: 2,3 or 33 eastsideslim: curisity call or misclick is misreading the board is only possibility TexasLimitKing: no comment Dealer: Hand #928945750 Dealer: Hand #928945750 has been canceled Dealer: TexasLimitKing wins the pot 
|
|
#3
09-03-2006, 04:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sick call with 4 high at $500/$1000 HU
You'd expect that anyone who had a program to reveal what the opponents whole cards were would raise here to prevent people from becoming suspicious.
Im guessing the guy didnt want to admit that he misread the board.
|
|
#4
09-03-2006, 07:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sick call with 4 high at $500/$1000 HU
This is standard. He obviously realised that he must be up against a pocket pair lower then 6's. Only reason he didnt raise the river was metagame imho.
|
|
#6
09-03-2006, 08:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sick call with 4 high at $500/$1000 HU
[ QUOTE ]
some who think pot odds and a strong read justified a call. [/ QUOTE ] lol
|
|
#8
09-04-2006, 01:50 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sick call with 4 high at $500/$1000 HU
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i'm no limit hold em expert [/ QUOTE ] I love double meanings. [/ QUOTE ] lol [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
|
#10
09-04-2006, 11:49 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sick call with 4 high at $500/$1000 HU
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i'm no limit hold em expert [/ QUOTE ] I love double meanings. [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
