Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Poker > Stud
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-02-2006, 12:58 PM
TStoneMBD TStoneMBD is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,274
Default stud 8 - question about SH and low vs high

lately when im playing stud 8 and a player raises a 9+ card in late position into my 3 card low i dont know what to do.

am i supposed to call the raise and get it heads up with a low vs a potential high pair? what if i know that they dont necessarily have a pair at all and that they are just stealing with high cards? do i call then? do i need a 3 card low that can make a flush/straight? what about a hand like 468 with 2 spades? can i ever 3bet his steal raise? i feel like folding 3 card lows to a guy stealing with high cards is just bad.

help, tx
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-02-2006, 01:51 PM
Raul Wong Raul Wong is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: I am awesome
Posts: 618
Default Re: stud 8 - question about SH and low vs high

Well a pair (like Qs) is typically a small favorite on 3rd street over three small cards. There is no way I am ever folding though.

Against what is suspect is total air...like JQ9 or something a lot of people will advocate a re-raise but I like to call on 3rd, and then see what I catch on 4th. My reasoning is that I hate re-poping it on 3rd and then catching a brick on 4th. This usually leads to making terrible plays on 4th and committing yourself to a pot where you are going to be playing from behind.

So in both situations I basically want to play a small pot on 3rd and 4th until I pick up something that I feel comfortable playing pots with. Not folding, but playing cautious until I have something worth putting in bets with.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-02-2006, 02:31 PM
bugstud bugstud is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: HEISMAN!
Posts: 10,151
Default Re: stud 8 - question about SH and low vs high

anything with 2 way potential I bomb and fling in money until I can't anymore
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-02-2006, 08:44 PM
Bartholow Bartholow is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Westeros
Posts: 1,755
Default Re: stud 8 - question about SH and low vs high

bugstud sorta covered this, but to be more clear: You want some way to win for high. This means an ace or some straight or flush potential. So you can still fold (25)7, but (46)8 with a 2 flush is playable and 678 is even better generally (as long as you don't have another low hand involved, if so your hand becomes junk).
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-03-2006, 09:24 AM
SweetLuckyMe SweetLuckyMe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 656
Default Re: stud 8 - question about SH and low vs high

[ QUOTE ]
lately when im playing stud 8 and a player raises a 9+ card in late position into my 3 card low i dont know what to do.

am i supposed to call the raise and get it heads up with a low vs a potential high pair? what if i know that they dont necessarily have a pair at all and that they are just stealing with high cards?

[/ QUOTE ] If you think there's a good possibility that it's a steal without a pair, then raise back if it's down to just the two of you - otherwise call. Your equity is good against any 3 high cards not paired, and your willingness to pound the pot early in a hand like that will protect your bringin in the future.

If you're up against what you think is a pair, then just call. Check/fold if you don't catch favorable on 4th and 5th. Regularly calling on 4th or 5th after bricking in this situation, when you're confident you're up against a pr, is a major leak and should be avoided.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.