Party sucks. Why do I play there?

[alimomoney]

There's no doubt that the Party software and their customer support are seriously flawed. It is so often a truly irritating place to play. And there are sites with lower rakes too. Yet the worst players in the world by the thousands play there every day. Am I playing online poker to have a pleasant software experience? Or am I trying to squeeze every last dollar I can out of these guys before they bust, never to be seen again?

See you at Party later tonight. Don't try one of those hopeless river bluffs though. (On second though, please do!)

[SoCalRugger]

We needed another thread like this. Thanks!

[ShakeZula06]

How many sites have you played at where you determine that obviously the worst players are at party? One?

[NoMeansYes_]

rakeback, table selection, bad players.

[alimomoney]

Party, paradise, Absolute, Ultimate Bet, Pacific, Doyle's Room, and I can go on. (But that surely wouldn't impact your smugness level.) Of course limits and games may make some difference. Maybe there are worse pot limit Omaha players elesewhere, I don't know.

[ShakeZula06]

[ QUOTE ]
rakeback

[/ QUOTE ]
There are countless places where you can get rakeback for a higher percentage and better reliability. It's not like this is a strong point for party.
[ QUOTE ]
table selection,

[/ QUOTE ]
This cuts in to your hourly rate quite a bit, unless you are buddy listing and datamining.
[ QUOTE ]
bad players.

[/ QUOTE ]
You can find that anywhere, what's your point?

[ShakeZula06]

[ QUOTE ]
Party, paradise, Absolute, Ultimate Bet, Pacific, Doyle's Room, and I can go on. (But that surely wouldn't impact your smugness level.) Of course limits and games may make some difference. Maybe there are worse pot limit Omaha players elesewhere, I don't know.

[/ QUOTE ]
Well, I'd agree that other HUD-compatible easily multitabling sites do have worse players then party. However those are the minority.