Omaha Noob Question

BLdSWtTRs · #1 08-28-2006, 02:46 PM

What hand is generally more profitable

KQ 54

KQJ 4

How does this change with more or less players

piiop · #2 08-28-2006, 02:49 PM

KQJ4

glass_onion · #3 08-28-2006, 02:49 PM

neither is profitable. But, kqj4.

BLdSWtTRs · #4 08-28-2006, 03:05 PM

would kqj4 double suited be profitable in a 5 handed game on the button or 2nd to the button?

BriMc · #5 08-28-2006, 03:18 PM

[ QUOTE ]
would kqj4 double suited be profitable in a 5 handed game on the button or 2nd to the button?

[/ QUOTE ]

Probably not in the long run, but I play stuff like that for image/metagame. I like everyone to think I'm a maniac. You need very strong reads to play these hands, even 5 handed its fairly common to have flush under flush.

piiop · #6 08-28-2006, 03:27 PM

[ QUOTE ]
would kqj4 double suited be profitable in a 5 handed game on the button or 2nd to the button?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yah

bugstud · #7 08-28-2006, 03:27 PM

[ QUOTE ]
would kqj4 double suited be profitable in a 5 handed game on the button or 2nd to the button?

[/ QUOTE ]

it's a reasonable holding.

beset · #8 08-28-2006, 03:37 PM

[ QUOTE ]
would kqj4 double suited be profitable in a 5 handed game on the button or 2nd to the button?

[/ QUOTE ]

Double-suited+short-handed+position = very nice hand.

ColdDecker333 · #9 08-28-2006, 05:55 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
would kqj4 double suited be profitable in a 5 handed game on the button or 2nd to the button?

[/ QUOTE ]

Double-suited+short-handed+position = very nice hand.

[/ QUOTE ]

xorbie · #10 08-28-2006, 09:45 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
would kqj4 double suited be profitable in a 5 handed game on the button or 2nd to the button?

[/ QUOTE ]

Probably not in the long run, but I play stuff like that for image/metagame. I like everyone to think I'm a maniac. You need very strong reads to play these hands, even 5 handed its fairly common to have flush under flush.

[/ QUOTE ]

lol @ maniac. this is an autoraise for me on the button.