Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Bonuses
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-23-2006, 01:42 PM
excession excession is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,302
Default best long-term deal for $200 NL player?

At the moment I'm a casual player (10-15 hrs/week)and so just flit from site to site working off the juiciest bonuses.
I 3-table 6 max $200 games.
I hit the £25 Cryptos each month (which are worth about $26/hr 3-tabling) and then just look for good sign up bonuses (stuff like Martin's/Bet Fred at the moment) or the occasional offer from a big site (Like the double FPP's at Stars before the New Year).

I have a rakeback deal at UB thru BW and about $1400 accumalted bonuses there but very rarely use it.

If I was to really put in some serious hand numbers in a month where would you suggest?

I think you can get RB at Full Tilt and it has the biggest selection of 6 max $200 games after Party and Stars - and a big sign up bonus that I assume works off very slowly?

I think you can get various deals at PokerRoom as well.

In terms of long-term $/hr what is the consensus for best bonus/RB/VIP program combo for a 6 max NL $200 player please?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-23-2006, 03:48 PM
Mobed Mobed is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Upstate
Posts: 203
Default Re: best long-term deal for $200 NL player?

I 2-3 table 6max 2-4 NL at Doyles Room. The weakest players ever w/ 25% rakeback to boot. Check out the Affiliates here for a nice offer. The down side is I belive it has no VIP program and reloads have been lean. In the end the weak players pay much better then weak bonuses.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-23-2006, 04:26 PM
KKrAAAzy88s KKrAAAzy88s is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 149
Default Re: best long-term deal for $200 NL player?

I agree that DR had some weak players, but it didn't/doesn't have PT support (don't know if that is still true).
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-23-2006, 05:35 PM
Isura Isura is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 13,926
Default Re: best long-term deal for $200 NL player?

[ QUOTE ]

I think you can get RB at Full Tilt and it has the biggest selection of 6 max $200 games after Party and Stars - and a big sign up bonus that I assume works off very slowly?


[/ QUOTE ]

Full tilt is definitely a good option. Rakeback + the bonus works out pretty well. The bonus cleared for me at 1/2 NL at about $16/hr 4-tabling
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-23-2006, 08:08 PM
Rockatansky Rockatansky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: AC is sexy
Posts: 520
Default Re: best long-term deal for $200 NL player?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

I think you can get RB at Full Tilt and it has the biggest selection of 6 max $200 games after Party and Stars - and a big sign up bonus that I assume works off very slowly?


[/ QUOTE ]
Full tilt is definitely a good option. Rakeback + the bonus works out pretty well. The bonus cleared for me at 1/2 NL at about $16/hr 4-tabling

[/ QUOTE ]

Does the bonus affect your MGR at Full Tilt?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-23-2006, 09:07 PM
2easy 2easy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Montana, USA
Posts: 801
Default Re: best long-term deal for $200 NL player?

the bonus, tourney overlays, processing fees and probably the barometric pressure as well all affect your mgr at fulltilt.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-23-2006, 11:17 PM
Benholio Benholio is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,411
Default Re: best long-term deal for $200 NL player?

I really think you shouldn't worry about rakeback until you are play high limits or extraordinary amounts of hands per month. Perhaps leave yourself some rakeback options for when you graduate to high limits (5/10+, $400NL+), but in the meantime you are going to be much better off bonus-hopping.

In the last ~3 months, I have played ~120k hands of $100NL and $200NL, and I have earned about 115-120% contributed rakeback on those hands just from bonuses.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-24-2006, 12:46 AM
thedustbustr thedustbustr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,556
Default Re: best long-term deal for $200 NL player?

[ QUOTE ]
I really think you shouldn't worry about rakeback until you are play high limits or extraordinary amounts of hands per month. Perhaps leave yourself some rakeback options for when you graduate to high limits (5/10+, $400NL+), but in the meantime you are going to be much better off bonus-hopping.

In the last ~3 months, I have played ~120k hands of $100NL and $200NL, and I have earned about 115-120% contributed rakeback on those hands just from bonuses.

[/ QUOTE ]

200NL maximizes the rake structure at most sites. The generated rake difference between 400NL and 200NL should be nil. And the rake is a much larger percent of your winnings as the lower limits.

This said I bonus whore at 200NL.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-24-2006, 09:41 AM
excession excession is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,302
Default Re: best long-term deal for $200 NL player?

I may have problem with FT RB thinking about it - I noticed last night that I signed up with FT when it first started just to check out the software - I have never deposited or played there though - wonder if I can still get a RB account - maybe if I ask them nicely to cancel my never used account... hmm..
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.