|
|
#31
08-21-2006, 03:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: QQ against Gildwulf and super fish (450+bb pot 3/6)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] umm...i would like your line for getting into a big pot with 66 against CO. he sounds like the kinda guy who is crushed by 66 here... [/ QUOTE ] i'm saying he's the kinda guy who would go broke with TT in this spot [/ QUOTE ] I know. What about 44? 57? AK? [/ QUOTE ] you're not even in that great shape vs AK since he has ten outs against you. As john kane would say, pushing 66 against this villain would be suicide. [/ QUOTE ] except the fours arent outs if you have 66 !! [/ QUOTE ] damn I thought my ninja edit would go unnoticed nice yves, you caught me there 
|
|
#32
08-21-2006, 06:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: QQ against Gildwulf and super fish (450+bb pot 3/6)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] just because worse hands are in gild's range, that doesnt mean that he necessarily has one of those hands. also, i dont think he cbets a missed AK here, since the donk is calling with nearly every pair here. he has AA/KK just so incredibly often here. [/ QUOTE ] yea, with two pf people calling a huge reraise it's obvious they are on a mid-high pp and there's no way I bet out with AK [/ QUOTE ] You don't bet on AK there??? Even vs. QQ you have 10 outs and you have equity...(note: I'm not looking at stack sizes just in general)
|
|
#33
08-21-2006, 07:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: QQ against Gildwulf and super fish (450+bb pot 3/6)
I didn't read all the posts but why not 4 bet the queens to start with PF. Otherwise does anyone like pushing all in preflop once gildwulf calls and the CO does as well. We are really only worried about KK, AA right??? There would be tons of dead money in the pot and this bet would look so strange that either player might look you up with a worse hand..??
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
