#1
|
|||
|
|||
FF Trade: Droughns for Taylor
I was offered this trade today which seems very good for me. But just wanted some additional input.
R. Droughns for C. Taylor. (I would be trading taylor) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FF Trade: Droughns for Taylor
please tell us which side you get.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FF Trade: Droughns for Taylor
I have taylor sorry.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FF Trade: Droughns for Taylor
The only bad thing about Droughns is that his OL seems to be dropping like flies.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FF Trade: Droughns for Taylor
ruben seems like a sure thing for like 800y and 8tds, but he wont get you any more than that, where as i think there is a potential for taylor to put up much better numbers, but the potential is also there for him to be a total bust
vikings are a risky proposition, i think i would prefer to avoid that whole situation, i'm still bitter from michael bennett 2 or 3 years back |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FF Trade: Droughns for Taylor
Take the trade.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FF Trade: Droughns for Taylor
Its the usual "sure thing" vs. guy whos not as sure but has a higher upside.
Go with the side you prefer obviously. If you have other good RBs i wouldnt do it. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FF Trade: Droughns for Taylor
I have LJ and Dominack Davis.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FF Trade: Droughns for Taylor
Keep Taylor then.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FF Trade: Droughns for Taylor
that is a amazingly bad trade for the guy getting taylor.
Droughns is a solid RB who will get a crapload of carries and all the goaline touches. Taylor hasnt looked good and is an unknown...plus Fiason will ge thte goalline touches. |
|
|