|
|
#13
08-18-2006, 07:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Leave the rake structure alone
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Leave the rake structure alone! It is fine the way it is. [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] says every tight nit with an 11% VpIp 
|
|
#14
08-18-2006, 08:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Leave the rake structure alone
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Leave the rake structure alone! It is fine the way it is. [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] It may be fine, but it's not rakefree, which is what wpex likes to say.
|
|
#15
08-18-2006, 09:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: An apology is in order Mr GM
Tony, out of curiosity, what is it about tight players that bothers you so much? You do realize that tight is usually right, as the saying goes? Obviously it would be great if every player on earth was a huge donk that played 80% of their hands, but this of course is impossible. When I see a bunch of tight players at my table I don't get mad at them, I just start looking for a different table.
|
|
#16
08-18-2006, 09:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: An apology is in order Mr GM
[ QUOTE ]
Tony, out of curiosity, what is it about tight players that bothers you so much? You do realize that tight is usually right, as the saying goes? Obviously it would be great if every player on earth was a huge donk that played 80% of their hands, but this of course is impossible. When I see a bunch of tight players at my table I don't get mad at them, I just start looking for a different table. [/ QUOTE ] Tight players per se don't bother me. I don't want to share MY rakeback with them. And if the rakeback is 100%, I like sharing with them even less. I don't mind multitablers per se. I HATE waiting on them to act, especially when the act is to fold. Tight multitablers ARE the fish when they have to play up to speed (UB mostly) and don't get any unearned rakeback (everywhere but WSEX). My problem with Party is that EVERY table has mostly multitablers on it. I end up waiting on 2 or 3 of them every orbit. (yeah, the 14 players that left Party didn't seem to change things much) Tony
|
|
#17
08-18-2006, 09:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: An apology is in order Mr GM
On the video of yours that I saw it seemed like you were taking quite awhile on some of your actions even when you weren't taking even longer to type in the chat-box, etc.
Clock ticking down to 5 seconds or less on multiple occasions IIRC.
|
|
#18
08-19-2006, 12:08 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: An apology is in order Mr GM
[ QUOTE ]
Clock ticking down to 5 seconds or less on multiple occasions IIRC. [/ QUOTE ] Don't do this tony, it bugs the hell out of us nits.
|
|
#19
08-19-2006, 01:17 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Leave the rake structure alone
[ QUOTE ]
Leave the rake structure alone! It is fine the way it is. [/ QUOTE ]
|
|
#20
08-19-2006, 01:51 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: An apology is in order Mr GM
[ QUOTE ]
On the video of yours that I saw it seemed like you were taking quite awhile on some of your actions even when you weren't taking even longer to type in the chat-box, etc. Clock ticking down to 5 seconds or less on multiple occasions IIRC. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, but it's different if you do it because you are multitabling.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
