Party Question?

[odyssey]

I have searched and not been able to find the answers that I was looking for. I apologize if this has already been discussed and ask if you would, please, to point me in the direction of that post.

I have been playing .50/1. at Party for several months now and have been keeping my head above water, but not making any significant gain. What I was wondering is how would you rate the 1/2, 2/4 tables at PP to the .50/1. in the way they play. Thank you, I appreciate your thoughts on this.

[doug funnie]

you will lose

[odyssey]

Thanks

[dun_noo]

[ QUOTE ]
you will lose

[/ QUOTE ]

[jman220]

[ QUOTE ]
Thanks

[/ QUOTE ]

He's telling the truth. Don't move up until you bank a solid win rate over a significant sample size of hands.

[Kevroc]

I find the 2/4 full ring softer than the 1/2 full ring at Party, mostly because 1/2 has shorthanded that takes alot of the fishier players.

But, don't move up until you are crushing .5/1

I spent June 2003 to May 2004 multitabling .5/1 until I moved up.

[odyssey]

Thank You. I appreciate your advise and will continue to work on the .50/1 until I can consistently beat them before trying any of the others.

[cardcounter0]

The 1/2 games play just like the .50/1 games, except you don't see the truely idiotic spewing chips quite as often.

However, if you are barely treading water at .50/1 with no gain, then you will tread water with no gain at 1/2 (with much larger swings, of course).

[g3rkshz]

when i was starting out playing online, i skipped .25/.50 and jumped straight to .50/1. however, after like 6 months, i had only an $85 profit which i thought sucked big time. the solution i found? multi-tabling + tournaments = more money that i could ever earn playing just a single table of .5/1.

[odyssey]

This must be where I'm missing it. I couldn't figure out how everyone was making money on the .5/1. tables. I have a lot to learn. [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] Thanks for the help.