#1
|
|||
|
|||
Two hands, one bad, one impressive
No reads, just utterly lost. Decided after the raise that there was no going back.
Party Poker Pot Limit Omaha Ring game Blinds: $0.50/$1 10 players Converter Stack sizes: Hero: $96 UTG+1: $70.74 UTG+2: $84.50 MP1: $24.50 MP2: $86.16 MP3: $107.53 CO: $395.25 Button: $84.44 SB: $193.75 BB: $200.98 Pre-flop: (10 players) Hero is UTG with 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] Hero calls, 3 folds, MP2 calls, <font color="#cc0000">MP3 raises to $6.5</font>, 4 folds, Hero calls, MP2 folds. Flop: Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] ($15.5, 2 players) Hero checks, <font color="#cc0000">MP3 bets $16.15</font>, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises to $64.6</font>, <font color="#cc0000">MP3 raises all-in $84.88</font>, <font color="#cc0000">Hero calls all-in $24.9</font>. Uncalled bets: $24.9 returned to Hero. Turn: Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] ($164.98, 0 player + 2 all-in - Main pot: $185.26) River: 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ($164.98, 0 player + 2 all-in - Main pot: $185.26) Results: Final pot: $164.98 And now, the lingering fear of the huge min-raise Party Poker Pot Limit Omaha Ring game Blinds: $0.50/$1 9 players Converter Stack sizes: UTG: $393.75 UTG+1: $57.44 MP1: $190.25 MP2: $202.18 Hero: $97.50 CO: $68.74 Button: $66.70 SB: $73.30 BB: $83.16 Pre-flop: (9 players) Hero is MP3 with Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 8[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#cc0000">UTG raises to $3.5</font>, 2 folds, MP2 calls, Hero calls, 3 folds, BB calls. Flop: 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ($14.5, 4 players) BB checks, UTG checks, <font color="#cc0000">MP2 bets $10</font>, Hero calls, BB folds, UTG calls. Turn: 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] ($44.5, 3 players) <font color="#cc0000">UTG bets $25.26</font>, MP2 calls, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises to $50.52</font>, UTG calls, MP2 calls. River: 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] ($196.06, 3 players) UTG checks, MP2 checks, <font color="#cc0000">Hero is all-in $33.48</font>, 2 folds. Uncalled bets: $33.48 returned to Hero. Results: Final pot: $196.06 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Two hands, one bad, one impressive
Hand 1. Were you tempted to raise PF?
Once you have CR'd him on the flop, your whole stack is in play. Why risk it with the second nuts? Better to lead out - you then get to find out where you are. If OP flat calls I'd be tempted to check it down, turn and river. A player read often isn't much use unless you know the OP plays the flop particularly tight. If I were raised by a tight/good player this should be an easy lay down. The only hand you are beating is trips or an (over) ambitious bluff by AA representing the nuts. Hand 2. 17 outs - possibly 19 - on the flop is a premium draw + a backdoor flush. I would like to raise the pot on the flop. If one of the player's has trips you are, best case scenario a little worse than a coinflip. Any overpair should fold and coupled with dead money should give you a small profit. There is always the possibility that you are duplicating your outs with the others. However, as it is, you hit a monster redraw on the turn. Facing a bet, I think you should raise all-in here. I can't see any point in the minraise - it's an invitation for people to call, or if they have a big hand, reraise. Tighter players will put you on top set. With money left on the river, I don't like the last bet. Any overpair should call here for that amount. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Two hands, one bad, one impressive
Hand 1:
I'd be tempted to lead out on the flop to define your hand better. If he raises then you can throw and only lose $15. With no line on the opponent I'd play it causiously as AAJx could be a possibility or four face cards. By the way he's re-raising a check raise he is v.strong but you have to call because of the odds Hand 2: I'd raise the flop and then on that turn to get it all in. Cant believe both folded on the river for $30 into $150 though |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Two hands, one bad, one impressive
I agree with guilt_trip for hand #1.
Hand #2: I like your flop call even with a strong draw like that, because you will have odds to call a turn bet, but if the board pairs you can get away from it. I cannot believe your turn and river play worked. I prefer just calling the turn. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Two hands, one bad, one impressive
[ QUOTE ]
Hand 1. Were you tempted to raise PF? Once you have CR'd him on the flop, your whole stack is in play. Why risk it with the second nuts? [/ QUOTE ] 1) Yes I was very tempted to raise preflop but did not this time. 2) I only risked my last $24 with the 2nd nuts, at the time of my C/R I thought I was going to be taking his c-bet down without a challenge. I think leading out would be the best play from now on with 2nd nuts like these. Unfortunately at this level, overplaying AAxx is way too common. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Two hands, one bad, one impressive
On the turn in hand #2 I viewed my minraise as essentially an all-in, since it made me pot-committed anyways, but with the caveat of making it look like I had a made hand, which ended up paying off. Most of the time I push the turn but Im seeing some serious merit to the fake-made-hand,pot-committed-anyways move on the turn here.
As it turns out, one player said he had the same draw as me with a higher flush, and the other player didnt reveal but was quite pissed when I showed my cards. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Two hands, one bad, one impressive
riddick, on hand 2 with the wrap, do you ever raise that flop and just try to get it AI right there?
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Two hands, one bad, one impressive
[ QUOTE ]
riddick, on hand 2 with the wrap, do you ever raise that flop and just try to get it AI right there? [/ QUOTE ] If I had a King to go with the wrap, making it an all-nut wrap draw then most often I will raise pot on the flop here, especially into a less than full-pot bet with position. Any club or 8 on the turn was the ideal card and prompted the heavy action. Otherwise I would have still remained very cautious, and wouldnt have been too excited if a King or Ten hit the board. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Two hands, one bad, one impressive
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] riddick, on hand 2 with the wrap, do you ever raise that flop and just try to get it AI right there? [/ QUOTE ] If I had a King to go with the wrap, making it an all-nut wrap draw then most often I will raise pot on the flop here, especially into a less than full-pot bet with position. [/ QUOTE ] I feel this is wrong, you should be more inclined to raise all in early in the hand if you have a lot of draws but many of them are not to the nuts. Because 1) you might get rid of someone who will make the nuts when you have the second nuts and 2) once you hit your hand, it is harder to get the same value from it. I've never heard this second idea explained properly but I'm sure you can justify it mathematically. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Two hands, one bad, one impressive
It's similar to how, if you have a big draw on the flop, you should be more inclined to get it all in if you are out of position.
|
|
|