Pacific Poker SNG's

[brenno11]

Hey just wondering what the structure of the pacific poker 10 man STTs is like and what the competetition is like in the low limits. I know there is lots of fish in the ring games and was wondering if its the same for tourneys there. Regards

[sng-sam]

This post is so you don't sit and wonder why no one is responding to your post. Most people here only play PartyPoker or PokerStars. You will be hard pressed to find many Pacific players here. Good Luck though.

SAM

[K䲰䮥n]

Low limit SnGs are probably fishy on every site.

[Kibby]

[ QUOTE ]
Low limit SnGs are probably fishy on every site.

[/ QUOTE ]

I here Pacific Poker low limit sngs is where Phil Ivey moonlights.

[entertainme]

I have played them a couplle times. I hate starting with 800 chips.

[Roy]

They're some of the fishiest SNGs on the net.

[k000k]

I call that site 'Pacific Ocean' for obvious reasons,

[DuderinoAB]

Their SNGs are the fishiest I've ever played. The 54's are the approximate equivalent of a Party 22. Plus they have 20% less rake than Party or Stars at that level. Nice. Too bad you can only play two tables, the structure is SLLLLLOOOOOOOOOOOWWWWWWWWWW, cashouts take 6 years, and the support is Party's only real competition for most incompetent on the net. If you're not playing more than two tables, you enjoy all of the above, and you hate reload bonuses, then this is the place for you.

[AliasMrJones]

SnGs take longer to fill up than party and the software sucks. Cashouts have been a bit of a hassle for me as well. Players are generally bad. The structure is quite slow as well. Slower even then Party regulars.

[mnlgrind]

I play at pacific poker, 4-table the low limit sngs. I'm going to cash-out and move to another site, coz the 800 starting stack sucks.