|
|
#1
08-15-2006, 02:49 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Why doesn\'t Stars have more 6-max tables for 15/30 and 30/60?
I don't get why the 10/20 tables are almost all 6-max, which is a good thing, but the 15/30 tables have only one 6-max, and same with 30/60 and 100/200. With 100/200 I understand because there is a limited amount of people who play, but 15/30 and 30/60 would probably have a lot more players if they made more 6-max tables. Many 10/20 players wuld move up. Right now there are often a lot of short-handed games at 30/60, like 3-4 handed, but I don't like playing at full tables because the amount of players can fluctuate often, short-handed games can fill up quickly, which is not what I want. To me full ring is kind of boring because you mostly have to play premium hands and KT offsuit is no good anymore, plus I don't think I have as much of an advantage at it, which is why I like 6-max better. So does anyone know why PokerStars doesn't have more 15/30 and 30/60 6-max tables?
|
|
#2
08-15-2006, 02:53 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Why doesn\'t Stars have more 6-max tables for 15/30 and 30/60?
Come play at Party, we'd be happy to have you.
|
|
#4
08-15-2006, 04:05 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Why doesn\'t Stars have more 6-max tables for 15/30 and 30/60?
Wasn't thaaj playing .02/.04 limit a few days ago?
|
|
#6
08-15-2006, 02:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Why doesn\'t Stars have more 6-max tables for 15/30 and 30/60?
Just move up to 30/60. Yeah, there is only one 6-max table, but on stars most of the 30/60 games are short handed (3 to 6 handed) and they usually stay that way. Once in a while your game will fill up when you don't want it to, but it never really bothered me (and yes, I usually leave if it fills).
Peter
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
