#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: To hell with partygammon
[ QUOTE ]
wow... didn't realize this was so popular... I would definitely need to read a couple good books. [/ QUOTE ] Read Paul Magriel. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: To hell with partygammon
[ QUOTE ]
i keep losing from those low rated players, i get the feeling (call me paranoid if you want) they give better rolls to the lower rated ones. [/ QUOTE ] Read a few posts on this website and you will understand that your results are a product of variance and that everyone goes through BIG swings in gambling games. Do you think Party would risk the millions of dollars of rake they make by not giving a fair game. Of course not. By the way, IMO this belongs in the Beats, Brags and Variance forum even if it isn't poker. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: To hell with partygammon
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] maybe there are other explainations, and i'm open for it. [/ QUOTE ] Ooh! Ooh! I know! Hint: It starts with an "S" and ends with "ample size". -Sam [/ QUOTE ] I'm confused... what could Scrample size possibly have to do with this? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: To hell with partygammon
I think he is referring to sample size.
Edit: And yes, I know you were, and so am I. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: To hell with partygammon
It's strange the level of play in PartyGammon is worse than Gammon Empire and FIBS but I get lowest rating in Party so I just stopped there.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: To hell with partygammon
[ QUOTE ]
It's strange the level of play in PartyGammon is worse than Gammon Empire and FIBS but I get lowest rating in Party so I just stopped there. [/ QUOTE ] Uhhh...whut?? |
|
|