#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL400: A-K tptk, check turn to induce bluff, then BAM
Why are people betting turn and not calling a push?
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL400: A-K tptk, check turn to induce bluff, then BAM
I don't think I would check that turn. I am definitely folding this river though. I hate losing 100BB stack with TPTK. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL400: A-K tptk, check turn to induce bluff, then BAM
bet the turn to charge all those draws. i wouldnt call this w/ a one pair hand w/out some read.
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL400: A-K tptk, check turn to induce bluff, then BAM
What time did you play the hand???? My hand took place at 9:14 PM PST. That is pretty sick.... I have no reason to lie here. I made a bad call on a very sneekly played A-A. The villan in my hand pushed with 10-9 on a previous hand to another player's K-K and hit runner-runner Q-J to make a straight. This hand is not about you. PP is rigged. I can't believe I'm back.
Back to the hand: it sucks that we know villan's hand, but why would he bet that much on the river. I showed weakness on the turn (my intention) and given his holdings, that is pretty locked board. I let the clock down before calling, it just seems that given the board and his hand, he can't put me on much. Can anyone explain that push given the strength of his hand? |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL400: A-K tptk, check turn to induce bluff, then BAM
post the entire hand history with stack sizes and results and everything. One of you is wrong, or PP is rigged.
maybe in the excitement you misread 77 as AA. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL400: A-K tptk, check turn to induce bluff, then BAM
I know it was A-A b/c I couldn't figure out why he bet that much with a locked board.
Is this a standard LAG play at 400NL or a donk move? It's hard getting comfortable at this limit. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL400: A-K tptk, check turn to induce bluff, then BAM
[ QUOTE ]
Hey, This hand I hit my set of 7's, and the river push was based on the fact that I put you on a good ace, and I figured you may put me on a flush draw/worse ace/total bluff. Figured if youd call a pot bet, you'd call the whole damn thing [/ QUOTE ] This explains my river push. The unconverted hand history is as follows: ***** Hand History for Game 4907867448 ***** $400 NL Texas Hold'em - Tuesday, August 08, 22:40:34 ET 2006 Table Monster #1278198 (No DP) (Real Money) Seat 4 is the button Total number of players : 6 Seat 3: IZSHUA ( $1374.78 ) Seat 4: kes1981 ( $404 ) Seat 1: yeahtompetty ( $1027.50 ) Seat 6: Riv3lino ( $491.90 ) Seat 5: MOTHER_TRUCKER ( $370.20 ) Seat 2: kielbasaking ( $140.50 ) MOTHER_TRUCKER posts small blind [$2]. yeahtompetty posts big blind [$4]. ** Dealing down cards ** Dealt to yeahtompetty [ 7h 7s ] kielbasaking calls [$4]. IZSHUA folds. kes1981 raises [$20]. MOTHER_TRUCKER folds. yeahtompetty calls [$16]. kielbasaking calls [$16]. ** Dealing Flop ** [ 7c, Ad, 9d ] yeahtompetty checks. kielbasaking checks. kes1981 bets [$44]. yeahtompetty calls [$44]. kielbasaking folds. ** Dealing Turn ** [ 6s ] yeahtompetty checks. kes1981 checks. ** Dealing River ** [ 2c ] yeahtompetty is all-In. kes1981 is all-In. yeahtompetty shows [ 7h, 7s ] three of a kind, sevens. kes1981 doesn't show [ Ac, Kc ] a pair of aces. The time at which hand ended:Aug 08 2006 22:40 ET yeahtompetty wins $623.50 from side pot #1 with three of a kind, sevens. yeahtompetty wins $827.50 from the main pot with three of a kind, sevens. If you're not 'kes1981' I apologize, but considering the hand is 100% identical, and it is from PP NL400 last night, I'm gonna go on a limb and say that it was me? |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL400: A-K tptk, check turn to induce bluff, then BAM
[ QUOTE ]
Is this a standard LAG play at 400NL or a donk move? It's hard getting comfortable at this limit. [/ QUOTE ] It's hard to get comfortable at a limit when you call $350 (100BB)with one pair. Whoever it was I played against called in about 2 seconds tops. Nice try on the subtle dig though Edit - You know it was AA because of the way you remember I bet, which is more reliable than the hand history you posted yesterday? |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL400: A-K tptk, check turn to induce bluff, then BAM
As J R DOT posted the exact hand history.
We have solid proof that PP is RIGGED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL400: A-K tptk, check turn to induce bluff, then BAM
I wanna see original poster post the actual hand history. This thread is awesome.
|
|
|