66 hand - Standard or BBV material?

[MATT111]

[ QUOTE ]
What on earth doesn't make sense? On the river, Hero is either betting for value or betting as a bluff. There's no in-between. Here, he's against two loose-passive opponents who have called down to the river, and he's got third pair. What the [censored] is going to call his river bet? K4o? K5o?



[/ QUOTE ]

i do not see why you wouldnt think at least one of them calls the river with a worse pair. If we are behind a better hand - so be it. I think we are ahead here pretty often though against hands that check behind on the river. Even many loose-passives raise the flop with a 9. So chances are that a caller holds a 7, 5, 3 or 2. With that many worse hands calling this looks like a not too close vb to me.

[Flintoff]

[ QUOTE ]
I like it all over. Hu I would c/c.

[/ QUOTE ]

[jba]

[ QUOTE ]

I think this hand is fine, if we were button however I would check this river against 2.


[/ QUOTE ]

[kapw7]

[ QUOTE ]

I'm so curious as to what worse hands you guys think will call a river bet.

[/ QUOTE ]

Why do you only consider K-hi?
We also beat A-hi and a pair of 2s, 3s, 4s, 5s

This is online poker. First you bet and then you ask what worse hands are calling.

Just to add: As I said in my OP, villains are not too passive. Very passive players are unpredictable. These guys are agressive enough to be predictable but not too agressive to become unpredictable. So I think I would have heard from a 7 especially b/c it is a 3-way hand. In fact that's the only reason that pushed me to bet instead of checking the river.

[kapw7]

[ QUOTE ]


... however I would check this river against 2.

True

[/ QUOTE ]

That's a great addition to the analysis of the hand

(No way do I claim that my play is the best)

[Str8Fish]

is raising 66 in the BB standard in s/h? Also, I would probably let go the aggression at the turn since I have 2 opponents and 2 overs on the flop. I'd either c/c the turn or c/f. I'm torn between the two of them.

Edited to add: yet again, I learn something new. I swear the more I read about 6-max here the more I see how important marginal situations are to you all. I gotta turn up my aggression a notch.

[True]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
What on earth doesn't make sense? On the river, Hero is either betting for value or betting as a bluff. There's no in-between. Here, he's against two loose-passive opponents who have called down to the river, and he's got third pair. What the [censored] is going to call his river bet? K4o? K5o?



[/ QUOTE ]

i do not see why you wouldnt think at least one of them calls the river with a worse pair. If we are behind a better hand - so be it. I think we are ahead here pretty often though against hands that check behind on the river. Even many loose-passives raise the flop with a 9. So chances are that a caller holds a 7, 5, 3 or 2. With that many worse hands calling this looks like a not too close vb to me.

[/ QUOTE ]

Right On.

True

[Pog0]

I would've checked preflop, and then either checked or folded the flop depending on if there was a bet to me or not.

[True]

[ QUOTE ]
I would've checked preflop, and then either checked or folded the flop depending on if there was a bet to me or not.

[/ QUOTE ]

if I hadn't raised PF, I would c/f the flop 80% of the time.

True

[Low Limit Loser]

[ QUOTE ]
I'd check and wouldn't overcall.

[/ QUOTE ]