The Monster's Effect on $2/$4NL 6max

[StacysMom]

1. Every taxi in vegas has a Monster advertisement on it.

2. "Party doesn't want winning players on their site" I can't believe how many people dont understand this is not true. If all the wining players quit, the former break evens would become winning, slight losers break even, big losers into slight losers. The only difference would be less players paying rake.

[Gregg777]

[ QUOTE ]
2. "Party doesn't want winning players on their site" I can't believe how many people dont understand this is not true.

[/ QUOTE ]

You can't believe how many people don't understand this is not true?

OK, fine...

Do you understand that a 5PTBB/100 winning player is now barely breaking even at certain NL limits on Party?

The highest stakes players are not affected right now, but in the long run there will be fewer players moving up if the mid limits are so much tougher to get past. So eventually it will affect everyone.

Are you that blind that you can't see that Party is gradually shifting away from skill?

First blackjack, then casino, then backgammon, then some monster promotion that effectively doubles the rake (for mid limits).

I am not a conspiracy theorist, but I'm not friggin blind either. Party may not intentionally be trying to push out the winning players, but they certainly are not taking them into consideration while shifting to their new formats.