#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5/10 NL-Top two no good?
you played this hand ok until you folded to his allin bet.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5/10 NL-Top two no good?
[ QUOTE ]
=== Board: 9h Jc Kd Dead: equity (%) win (%) tie (%) Hand 1: 47.9656 % 47.32% 00.65% { KsJd } Hand 2: 52.0344 % 51.39% 00.65% { KK+, JJ, 99, K9s, QTs, J9s, K9o, QTo, J9o } === If you think he's solid, then you're definitely behind: === Board: 9h Jc Kd Dead: equity (%) win (%) tie (%) Hand 1: 32.8526 % 32.10% 00.75% { KsJd } Hand 2: 67.1474 % 66.39% 00.75% { KK, JJ, 99, K9s, QTs, K9o, QTo } === He could be bluffing, but I don't seeing him doing that unless he knows you and knows you can lay down hands. [/ QUOTE ] Ok this definitely makes the call look a lot better to me. I think his range is closer to to first one than the second, and with the odds that makes this an obvious call. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5/10 NL-Top two no good?
[ QUOTE ]
Ok I didn't actually fold obviously, i'm not that bad . FYP. Folding is terrible, no good player would fold for 100bbs without a read. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5/10 NL-Top two no good?
[ QUOTE ]
=== Board: 9h Jc Kd Dead: equity (%) win (%) tie (%) Hand 1: 47.9656 % 47.32% 00.65% { KsJd } Hand 2: 52.0344 % 51.39% 00.65% { KK+, JJ, 99, K9s, QTs, J9s, K9o, QTo, J9o } === If you think he's solid, then you're definitely behind: === Board: 9h Jc Kd Dead: equity (%) win (%) tie (%) Hand 1: 32.8526 % 32.10% 00.75% { KsJd } Hand 2: 67.1474 % 66.39% 00.75% { KK, JJ, 99, K9s, QTs, K9o, QTo } === He could be bluffing, but I don't seeing him doing that unless he knows you and knows you can lay down hands. [/ QUOTE ] We are very very close to having direct pot odds to call against that second range. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5/10 NL-Top two no good?
It was a good call, just cold deck
|
|
|