|
|
|
|
#1
07-20-2006, 11:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: under-rated sequels
[ QUOTE ]
What about The Terminator vs. Terminator II? [/ QUOTE ] Both classics, I think that many would agree on this one. Same with Aliens vs. Alien I'd have to put the sequel in front, but not by much. 
|
|
#2
07-21-2006, 02:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: under-rated sequels
bill & ted's bogus journey. not as good as the original, but still an excellent movie. best on screen portrayal of the grim reaper ever.
|
|
#3
07-21-2006, 02:51 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: under-rated sequels
Once again he asked for UNDERrated sequels
most sequels are horrible, and we all know that, and a few sequels a really really awesome (T2, Aliens, Godfather II, etc.) and everyone know sthat. The original example of 2010 is a great one for this thread, as it gets no "talk" really but is a solid movie and genrally overlooked/underrated. That's not to say it's "better" than 2001.
|
|
#4
07-21-2006, 09:33 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: under-rated sequels
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] What about The Terminator vs. Terminator II? [/ QUOTE ] Both classics, I think that many would agree on this one. Same with Aliens vs. Alien I'd have to put the sequel in front, but not by much. [/ QUOTE ] ....I'll drink to that. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|
|
#5
07-21-2006, 09:56 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: under-rated sequels
Temple of Doom is generally though to be the worst of the Raiders movies, but if it were the only one made, I think it would be more highly praised. It's biggest crime is that it just doesn't exceed the original.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
