Preflop - Hate it or love it. AT OTB

[True]

60/11/.7 raises UTG, 2 folds, Hero calls AT.

SB is 30/20/2.8, BB is unknown.

True

[sharpie]

I dislike. I don't think your hand matches up well against his range, plus coldcalling is icky.

[True]

[ QUOTE ]
I dislike. I don't think your hand matches up well against his range, plus coldcalling is icky.

[/ QUOTE ]

don't mind the coldcall too much as SB will have a small range to play here, BB would be the only concern.

I am concerned however about AT plays against his hand range. He seems passive enough however to give me some rivers cheaply.

True

[sharpie]

By coldcalling you basically have to hit to win, unless we have a predictable read on the villain or he has a wider range than I think.

I don't know the exact numbers but you'll only hit the flop about a 3rd of the time, and sometimes you'll be dominated when you do flop.

[Scary_Tiger]

AWFUL AWFUL AWFUL.

[True]

back to the drawing board hey [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

True

p.s. maybe I just found the 2 people that hated it before I found the ones that loved it [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

[Scary_Tiger]

[ QUOTE ]
back to the drawing board hey [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

True

p.s. maybe I just found the 2 people that hated it before I found the ones that loved it [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Like have you read Hold'em Poker for Advanced Players? I think they took like twenty pages to bash playing AT against a raiser.

[True]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
back to the drawing board hey [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

True

p.s. maybe I just found the 2 people that hated it before I found the ones that loved it [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Like have you read Hold'em Poker for Advanced Players? I think they took like twenty pages to bash playing AT against a raiser.

[/ QUOTE ]

only books I have read are :

Phil gordons little green book and super system 2

True

edit : This is not a play I make ever, I did however make it today as I think against this player it would be easy to find out if I am ahead, he is also loose enough to pay me off.

[Scary_Tiger]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
back to the drawing board hey [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

True

p.s. maybe I just found the 2 people that hated it before I found the ones that loved it [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Like have you read Hold'em Poker for Advanced Players? I think they took like twenty pages to bash playing AT against a raiser.

[/ QUOTE ]

only books I have read are :

Phil gordons little green book and super system 2

True

edit : This is not a play I make ever, I did however make it today as I think against this player it would be easy to find out if I am ahead, he is also loose enough to pay me off.

[/ QUOTE ]

It's pretty amusing because they talk about it as a hand a "self-educated" player will frequently overvalue in the wrong situations. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[raytownloc]

Really hate it. Against an 11% pfraiser, I need stats more like 60/40/x, i.e. something far out of the ordinary. Cold calling with AT is spewy.