|
|
#301
07-17-2006, 07:17 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official Battle of Champions
[ QUOTE ]
Between 7/16 and 7/17 I am 28.8 bb/green over a couple thousand (3) hands. [/ QUOTE ] Wow sir! How do you do it?! Do you give lessons? Ps. This thread needs pictures of hot women. 
|
|
#302
07-17-2006, 07:34 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Official Battle of Champions
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Between 7/16 and 7/17 I am 28.8 bb/green over a couple thousand (3) hands. [/ QUOTE ] Wow sir! How do you do it?! Do you give lessons? Ps. This thread needs pictures of hot women. [/ QUOTE ] Lol. No-one is buying your crap fish. We all come on here and post out 70,000 hand break-even strecthes. Or our 2B/100 over 100,000. Things like that. No-one gives a fck about 2000 hands. If we can all show stats from the long run, what makes you so special that you cant? And I am not 'green' with envy. I don't even play NL. I do, however, respect the opinions of some of the great NL players on here and if they call bs, then that's pretty good by me too.
|
|
#303
07-17-2006, 11:47 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Official Battle of Champions
I've never seen so much desire to be statistically accurate in a "brag" post. I thought this was where someone goes to be cocky, not ask for advice.
[ QUOTE ] I don't even play NL. I do, however, respect the opinions of some of the great NL players on here and if they call bs, then that's pretty good by me too. [/ QUOTE ] This statement is just hilarious. Why would you feel the need to contribute your opinion if you acknowledge that you don't know what you're talking about? If you know you're just going to parrot other people's posts, save your time for the next lynch mob or pack of lemmings you come across.
|
|
#304
07-17-2006, 12:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Official Battle of Champions
[ QUOTE ]
I've never seen so much desire to be statistically accurate in a "brag" post. I thought this was where someone goes to be cocky, not ask for advice. [ QUOTE ] I don't even play NL. I do, however, respect the opinions of some of the great NL players on here and if they call bs, then that's pretty good by me too. [/ QUOTE ] This statement is just hilarious. Why would you feel the need to contribute your opinion if you acknowledge that you don't know what you're talking about? If you know you're just going to parrot other people's posts, save your time for the next lynch mob or pack of lemmings you come across. [/ QUOTE ] I said I don't play NL. I didn't say I have NEVER played NL. I've played 1000NL on many occasions. I propped for over a year playing strictly NL and made about 50K from it including a 10K seat for the WPT. I've made the switch to limit this year. By all means enlighten us as to the wealth of your experience in NL. Should be fun.
|
|
#305
07-17-2006, 01:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Official Battle of Champions
[ QUOTE ]
Must be fun to be a statistical anomaly. Theoretically if you get enough poker players there eventually will be one who only gets dealt AA every hand. You do need a lot of players tho... a lot. I wonder how you still have time to play with all the bragging here [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] (nah, but seriously, if you are such a great player; as in, much better than some of the world champions, how come you don't know about statistics, variance, sample size and all that? It's fun to be winning, I know. But did you ever loose your whole stack to a 2 outer yet? when you have a perfect read on him holding KK while you have AA, and the river showing a pretty king? These things happen, even when you play perfectly.) [/ QUOTE ] oh yes this thread is still gold wonderful
|
|
#307
07-17-2006, 01:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Normal BB/100?
Also, your Party handle has already been outed. No need to blackout your name constantly.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
