![]() |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] A second later, Button looks at BB and says, "You didn't have an Ace did you. I'll bet you $5 that you didn't have an Ace." BB says "How about we make it $10." [/ QUOTE ] Button says "Nevermind", having gotten his information for free. [/ QUOTE ] Maybe the BB was bluffing! Again! Boy... you people just don't understand poker psychology. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] A second later, Button looks at BB and says, "You didn't have an Ace did you. I'll bet you $5 that you didn't have an Ace." BB says "How about we make it $10." [/ QUOTE ] Button says "Nevermind", having gotten his information for free. [/ QUOTE ] Maybe the BB was bluffing! Again! Boy... you people just don't understand poker psychology. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] But maybe he really did have AK and was planning on "losing" the $10 prop bet to set up the Button for later. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] A second later, Button looks at BB and says, "You didn't have an Ace did you. I'll bet you $5 that you didn't have an Ace."BB says "How about we make it $10." [/ QUOTE ]Button says "Nevermind", having gotten his information for free. [/ QUOTE ]Maybe the BB was bluffing! Again! [/ QUOTE ] I doubt it. A min raise like that at the end wants a call. If the BB went way over the top with a counteroffer of like $25 or $100 I'd be suspicious, but then again he might know that looks suspicious and make such a raise on purpose for deception. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good analysis, TomBrooks. Could you run some Sklansky-Chubukov numbers and tell me how good a hand you need to make an all-in raise there?
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If the button comes over the top and offers to bet him $1000 that he didn't have an ace, then he has a pretty sick tell on the other guy. Which means he would have called with his KK in the first place.
|
![]() |
|
|