|
View Poll Results: Huckabee | |||
Yes | 15 | 13.39% | |
No | 54 | 48.21% | |
Other | 43 | 38.39% | |
Voters: 112. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
.
[ QUOTE ]
I think, if you are certain you will fold the river to a raise, why not check and call? You will save a bet when villian's draw made it, and induce someone with a Q or J to bet the river. I suggest this only if you insist on folding to the river raise. [/ QUOTE ] Are you saying you want to induce a bluff on this specific hand? There are plenty of times that bet/fold is the proper line on the river. If the read is legit on this hand, I particularly like it. This guy is only raising a flush, but will call all day with a J or Q. Also, what makes you think this villian is betting a J here? I'd be pleasantly surprised if he bet a Q. (edit..., didn't see "river-aggro"..., but I still don't think villian bets a J. I've not met a 0.8, riveraggro guy, but if he is, I bet/call) But..., as said earlier, if the read is only over a few hands, you must call this. But regardless of read, unless I know this villain makes a lot of river bluffs, I am always betting this river. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: how do you like this river fold?
[ QUOTE ]
I think, if you are certain you will fold the river to a raise, why not check and call? You will save a bet when villian's draw made it, and induce someone with a Q or J to bet the river. I suggest this only if you insist on folding to the river raise. [/ QUOTE ] Because players with those stats don't always bet the Q, J, or whatevers that you beat and only bet the flush that you don't. Check-calling would be something to consider against a somewhat aggro opponent if the river was the J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] instead for instance |
|
|