MISH-MASH III: THE MISHMASHENING

[SynSid]

[ QUOTE ]
12 votes on AW, somethin aint right. Just got coffee, need to get a few tables hours in, then I will read all of alpha's posts and go back over the tokyo/bobo feud the first day, and maybe over the rules yet again. I probably wont be able to really keep up until tomorrow when I am at work, I figure it will take at least an hour today to come up with any semblance of a reasonable vote for tonight.

[/ QUOTE ]

A high vote count isn't anything like as suspicious as usual due to there being 2 evil factions. If someone genuinely looks wolfy then you'd expect votes to pile on from the other wolfy faction as well as from villagers - maybe moreso.

Whereas I can easily see why people conclude AW is a moron I'm not so clear on why people think he's a wolf. IF he turns out to be one faction then I'd be looking hard at whoever led the drive on him for members of the other faction.

[xorbie]

[ QUOTE ]
IF he turns out to be one faction then I'd be looking hard at whoever led the drive on him for members of the other faction.

[/ QUOTE ]

this would be convenient if you guys were part of the same faction.

[xorbie]

also, gone for world cup.

[SynSid]

Having double-checked the rules I vote mccread.

What I wanted to check before actually voting was that there was no cost involved in vote-changing by an evil faction. As there's no cost then IF mccread is evil it becomes almost a certainty that his faction would buy a vote off of him: that becomes doubly true if he's actually the vote-buyer himself.

Whilst this in no way negates the possibility that he won a coin-flip as a villager, it does make the likelihood of him being evil higher than for anyone else (in the absence of other evidence).