Shorthand vs Full table

Joeyyungrocks · #1 07-03-2006, 07:56 AM

Which one do you guys perfer and why?
The reason being I have been playing shorthanded for the longest time now and I was wondering maybe it is time to switch since I play a tighter then normal game shorthanded. It just seems my style would fit better there. My VPIP for shorthanded is 18.52 which seems a bit low. So should I move to full tables or loosen up at shorthanded. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Gelford · #2 07-03-2006, 10:38 AM

Do what you feel is right, The Edge had a post here a week ago about him having a VI$IP of 17 and beating the highest stakes 6max, so there is nothing wrong with your stats as such.

All is personal preference, but if 6 max bores you, there is nothing wrong with sitting down at a full table

flo · #3 07-03-2006, 10:40 AM

How can 6max be boring and FR be entertaining? [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Joeyyungrocks · #4 07-03-2006, 07:11 PM

Haha true true FR would be boring, and I can only play 4 tables on Full Tilt so I guess I should probably stick to SH.

Dan Bitel · #5 07-03-2006, 07:13 PM

joey,

email FT, they let you play more tables

coleco · #6 07-03-2006, 07:40 PM

I just switched to SH after many thousands of hand at FR ,and I like it alot better right now but I'll mix it up and play both.

Vertigo50 · #7 07-03-2006, 07:42 PM

[ QUOTE ]
I just switched to SH after many thousands of hand at FR ,and I like it alot better right now but I'll mix it up and play both.

[/ QUOTE ]

Why do you like it better? Can you elaborate?

More profitable? More fun? Or both?