33,000 hand checkup - Page 3

econophile · #21 07-01-2006, 08:49 PM

it is good you are winning. you could win more by playing more hands.

chris_a · #22 07-01-2006, 08:53 PM

1) They got nasty first.
2) I only said optimal once. What I meant by optimal was that I am able to make more money per hour with 16VPIP at 6 tables than 22-28 or whatever VPIP or whatever at 4 tables. This criterion of optimality is $/hr.

chris_a · #23 07-01-2006, 08:55 PM

I said it right in the original post. I am not interested in VPIP assessments. Most in postflop play.

shaodeee · #24 07-01-2006, 09:10 PM

Why not post actual hands instead of giving us a bunch of stats? Its hard to determine what you are doing postflop just from statistics. Post some actual hands where you felt you could've played better/extracted more value/folded/etc.

shaodeee · #25 07-01-2006, 09:14 PM

And you said you didn't want people to talk about your VPIP. But just one thing.... If you were playing at a 5/10 table, your $ would be gone fairly quickly.

chris_a · #26 07-01-2006, 09:23 PM

Because I play 16VPIP?? Ok, think that.

dietlime · #27 07-01-2006, 09:59 PM

switch to full ring. play exactly the same. 12 table.

siccjay · #28 07-01-2006, 10:05 PM

Chris a,

You are playing too tight.

Sincerely,
All of 2+2.

spatne · #29 07-01-2006, 10:11 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Chris a,

Fold preflop. In life. In poker. You have plenty of practice.

Sincerely,
All of 2+2.

[/ QUOTE ]

PotLuckPete · #30 07-01-2006, 11:19 PM

No disrespect to any 1/2 players here, but most are absolutely positively (Im looking for more adjectives) horrendous. Why not mix it up more and take advantage of their poor playing and your position.

You can definately beat the 1/2 game playing like a nit, no doubt. You're going to get mowed over in the bigger games. What's your screen name on Pacific again? [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]