|
|
#41
06-30-2006, 03:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Any Two Suited from SB??
This whole thread:
[ QUOTE ] GOLD [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] 
|
|
#43
06-30-2006, 04:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Any Two Suited from SB??
I'd like to add that table dynamics determine for a large part the range you will be completing the SB with. Depending on the way the table has been playing I decide whether I want to raise hands like KJo from the SB, or just complete with them for instance.
Naturally, I will tighten up my completing range as postflop play is harder. e.g. when there is considerably more agression postflop, less reason to expect to get payed off, or an other way opponents are giving you problems. I guess it boils down to the degree of control I'm having. On a related note, I'm curious how much people are raising from the SB. I suspect my raising range from the SB is too tight. Let alone my reraising range.
|
|
#45
07-01-2006, 11:30 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Any Two Suited from SB??
[ QUOTE ]
I very rarely raise from the SB. [/ QUOTE ] Start raising your absolute trash hands ~10% of the time.
|
|
#46
07-03-2006, 06:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Any Two Suited from SB??
Only playing down to ATs in this position for 1/2 price is too tight if you have med-big stack. Of course, you're more looking to hit the good side of a straight than a flush the lower you go or some other beautiful flop.
|
|
#48
07-03-2006, 07:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Any Two Suited from SB??
Looking at those numbers, I've probably been leaking out of the SB a lot. Wish I could use pokertracker [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img], it'd be much easier to spot. Although I do think it's EV to be OOP in blind battles, so I complete with any two there.
|
|
#50
07-03-2006, 07:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Any Two Suited from SB??
[ QUOTE ]
AoS, WTF? Why's it better to be OOP in blind battles??? HUH? [/ QUOTE ] Autobetting any flop with any two(heads up only of course) seems to be EV. At least in my experience...
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
