![]() |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
I never realized how much bitterness there was in this forum. There's very few regular posters. Most of them make a good win rate. Don't worry about your win rate, just try to play every hand as well as you can. If you feel you didn't play a hadn your best and don't know why then ask. It's very very VERY easy. [/ QUOTE ] This has nothing to do with why I am asking about winrates. Don't worry about your winrate? Why not... thats the reason you play. I have heard that the 100 nl full ring game isn't very profitable, so I am wondering if anyone out there is doing well at it. You may wonder why I am being persistent about a game I have heard isn't very profitable... well, my bankroll/style i want to play right now fits the 100nl. I try and play every hand as best I can/try to learn as well. Trying to up my winrate/wonder about a game being worth my time has little to do with trying to play well/learn... |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
thats what i figured-but why put that in there in the 1st place?
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
$100NL full is insanely profitable and the best game there is I think apart from 6max. It's the cutoff for the small stakes 'mom and dad/college kids' players who'll happily give you their money.
I posted a graph of my win/loss rate here, it may be of some interest. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
thats what i figured-but why put that in there in the 1st place? [/ QUOTE ] Pokertracker figures a BB to be twice the actual big blind (which we usually refer to as BB) in its winrate calculations. So, to avoid confusion, PTBB now means 2x big blind. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
understood, thank you
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
and if you don't have PT, how do you work it out. I have P Office?
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
and if you don't have PT, how do you work it out. I have P Office? [/ QUOTE ] pokeroffice reports $won/hand which you can easily convert to PTBB/100 (a PTBB is twice the big blind). For example, if you're playing with a 0.5 big blind then multiply $won/hand by 100, if playing with a $1 big blind then multiply by 50. beware of the BB/100 column in the pokeroffice livetracker (at least in all versions up to the current version of 1.89). When you mouse over the column heading you'll see the label "Big Bets per 100 hands" but for party skins this is actually "big blinds per 1 hand" (you need to multiply this number by 50 to get PTBB/100). To make matters worse, the value reported for poker stars is calculated differently. I don't have stars running at the moment but I think it's "big blinds per 100 hands" (different from PTBB/100 by a factor of 2). |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
O.k - So let me see if I understand this correctly (I do not have PT, so I am going to have to do the math myself)
Original Buy in: 22.00 Current Stack size: 96.23 Hands Played: 749 ( I KNOW THIS IS A VERY SMALL SAMPLE!) Game Size: .05/.10 NL So Winnings = 74.23 / 2xBB (.20)= 371.15 PTBB 371.15 PTBB / (749 / 100) 7.49 = 49.55 O.k now that I work that out, I must have done something wrong, there is no way my win rate could be that high right...? What part of the math did I screw up? Also - Since I play on Bodog mostly, is there another program that works with that site since PT does not? Should I just switch sites... Is it going to be worth it you guys think? Thanks for all your help Newbie |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
crewshell, your math is right. You say you know your sample size is small, but then you are questioning your results? Your answer is in your post.
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
$100NL full is insanely profitable and the best game there is I think apart from 6max. It's the cutoff for the small stakes 'mom and dad/college kids' players who'll happily give you their money. I posted a graph of my win/loss rate here, it may be of some interest. [/ QUOTE ] I'm going to argue 200NL is the cutoff. |
![]() |
|
|