|
|
#52
06-17-2006, 02:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Most under-rated 2+2er and why?
[ QUOTE ]
I'm not smoothcall. This is quite obvious. Anyone posting otherwise is only backing up my claim that 90% of posters here are worthless nitwits. Smoothcall does not fit into this category so obviously 90% of posters won't like his stuff. If you are going to ban Smoothcall for anything it should be for failing to use paragraphs. Myself I'd rather read his worst ranting nonsense than 100% of the idiotic crap masquerading as humor that often appears on these forums. [/ QUOTE ] LMAO So is using paragraphs your idea of a message-board fake mustache? 
|
|
#55
06-17-2006, 03:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Most under-rated 2+2er and why?
[ QUOTE ]
Only if yours is to post something worth reading. [/ QUOTE ] That doesn't make sense. You really have to find something better to do than keep showing up under pseudonyms to message boards where you clearly don't get along with anybody.
|
|
#56
06-17-2006, 04:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Most under-rated 2+2er and why?
[ QUOTE ]
Entity [/ QUOTE ] No longer a poster [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] -DeathDonkey
|
|
#57
06-17-2006, 04:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Most under-rated 2+2er and why?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Only if yours is to post something worth reading. [/ QUOTE ] That doesn't make sense. You really have to find something better to do than keep showing up under pseudonyms to message boards where you clearly don't get along with anybody. [/ QUOTE ] Yawn. Being wrong doesn't make you any more interesting. Time to go into 'the tank' and come up with a worthwhile post. 1/5000 or so can't be such a bad average lol.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
