Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > MTT Community
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71  
Old 06-03-2006, 07:23 PM
bigballz bigballz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: final table sucking
Posts: 4,557
Default Re: Stealthmunk vs. stevesbets HU 5K

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Even if they only collected 1% of the total matches played, if they had 3000 on any player, thats going to be pretty close to their 'actual roi'.


well, players skill level changes and so does the competitions, so 'actual roi' is a [censored] term, but it should be useful anyhow.

and i'm not saying it's good/accurate for total profit/avg profit. but statements like
"Sharkscope is ridiculously inaccurate and should NOT be used to gauge anyones performance. "

Are stupid without any qualifiers/explanation.

[/ QUOTE ]

well, they miss a lot of 5k's. missing a few hundred 5k's of stevebets's where he plays say lars and gets really owned drastically changes the numbers. sng variance is a monster bitch.

[/ QUOTE ]
lol so they selectively miss ones where he loses? I think 3k sngs is enough to gauge a good idea of his success.
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 06-03-2006, 07:24 PM
bigballz bigballz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: final table sucking
Posts: 4,557
Default Re: Stealthmunk vs. stevesbets HU 5K

also, go enjoy your birthday [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] don't waste your time arguing with us
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 06-03-2006, 07:42 PM
bugstud bugstud is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: HEISMAN!
Posts: 10,151
Default Re: Stealthmunk vs. stevesbets HU 5K

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Even if they only collected 1% of the total matches played, if they had 3000 on any player, thats going to be pretty close to their 'actual roi'.


well, players skill level changes and so does the competitions, so 'actual roi' is a [censored] term, but it should be useful anyhow.

and i'm not saying it's good/accurate for total profit/avg profit. but statements like
"Sharkscope is ridiculously inaccurate and should NOT be used to gauge anyones performance. "

Are stupid without any qualifiers/explanation.

[/ QUOTE ]

well, they miss a lot of 5k's. missing a few hundred 5k's of stevebets's where he plays say lars and gets really owned drastically changes the numbers. sng variance is a monster bitch.

[/ QUOTE ]
lol so they selectively miss ones where he loses? I think 3k sngs is enough to gauge a good idea of his success.

[/ QUOTE ]

I wasn't arguing intentional selectivity [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] randomness in that can mean a lot though, even over large samples.

and yes, this will probably be the last sober post of the evening [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old 06-03-2006, 10:05 PM
LongBall42 LongBall42 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: St. Paul, MN
Posts: 186
Default Re: Stealthmunk vs. stevesbets HU 5K

Stealth, no disrepect bro. I just saw the thread on P5s on how you thought Stevesbets sucks and it has been intriguing me. The last hand, meh, just had to show something I guess....

gl
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old 06-04-2006, 12:31 AM
Exitonly Exitonly is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: There\'s treasure everywhere.
Posts: 9,482
Default Re: Stealthmunk vs. stevesbets HU 5K

no single hand shows ANYTHING AT ALL about either player in the match. This is stupid.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.