crappy KK hand($200nl)

[Hoopster81]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Mid pairs will fire this river.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think that they will. Most I think would check behind with TT or hands like that.

[/ QUOTE ]

At 25/50 or whatever you were playing before, I'm sure they would.

Definately a call at 1/2.

[jbeckern6]

I only recently came to no limit from limit (10/20 and 5/10) but I certainly wouldn't call a substantial pf reraise and then another substantial flop bet, with an overcard with a mid pair. I don't see the river bet being a bluff because I think this action means a made hand that was at minimum top pair on the flop.

[GGrey]

I'd bet the turn. You'd probably find out a whole lot more by doing so.

[amoeba]

[ QUOTE ]
I'd bet the turn. You'd probably find out a whole lot more by doing so.

[/ QUOTE ]

this is a horrible reason to bet the turn.

[TheStation]

With the weak $45 bet on the flop into a $70 pot i call the river everytime as you just look so weak - you didnt do anything to look strong in this hand, if I would have read it without looking at your hand I would have guessed AK

I think people would constantly float you in spots like this and you appear to play very weak tight so i can see why they would

[ActionDJ]

Call the river!!! If you are going to ch/ch the turn you want to call that river, you have induced a bluff, even though there is a chance he is value betting. If you bet the river you lose the opportunity to get him to bluff and only get called or raised by a better hand (probably). Check/call the river if you check/check the turn. Of course there is always debate about checking the turn, Im not convinced he has a Q or a set, so I probably bet out the turn.

[bilbo-san]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Call river

[/ QUOTE ]

Besides a bluff what do I beat?

[/ QUOTE ]

You checked not once, but twice. Why do you think a bluff is not likely?

Someone once wrote on this board that you shouldn't induce bluffs that you aren't willing to call, and I think it's very good advice.