|
|
#1
05-26-2006, 09:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
set vs small stack
couple quick replys is fine.
party 2/4. I have 33, i raise it up 15, 1 caller has 70 behind after call flop comes q 9 3 with two diamonds. normally i just cont bet like vs anyone else. but anyone likw gicving a card for some action? Thx 
|
|
#3
05-26-2006, 09:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: set vs small stack
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] flop comes q 9 3 with two diamonds. [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] Meh, it's not like OP can fold if a draw hits anyway, the guy only has 70. It depends on your read of the guy. If he will take shots when you check then go for it. I like playing passively vs. shorties sometimes. The bad ones love to bluff when you show weakness.
|
|
#4
05-26-2006, 09:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: set vs small stack
Yes, I often check in these spots. It depends on if I have seen villain call of his stack with AJ on boards like this or not though. But when they are short and get checked to I find they move in a lot. I would either move in or check, betting less isn't an option IMO.
|
|
#6
05-26-2006, 09:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: set vs small stack
in this case he folded.
But i always bet this, cause they call with mid pairs / ace high etc. but i guess it comes down to reads. some reraise allin most flops, some will cower off. i guess my point was are we really worried abotu draws when its so short? seems mixed respionse on that and i dont know if its make or break as a poker player, but something u see soo damn often at party.....
|
|
#7
05-26-2006, 10:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: set vs small stack
Bah you guys who play so ABC and fail to capitalize on the weakness' of your opponents suck.
If the shorty has an aggro factor of 3 or higher I check this almost 100% of the time. If he's fairly passive, I go ahead and bet. It's not like shorty is going to check behind with a flush draw...
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
