Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Science, Math, and Philosophy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-19-2006, 11:55 AM
Tater10 Tater10 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: 42.3827 -87.94149
Posts: 247
Default Loading a bat

How would one modify an aluminum softball bat?

How much distance would it add on average?

This is just an experiment, I have an old aluminum softball bat, and I drilled out the plug on the end. I'm going to throw some metal washers in there and epoxy it up. It will look obviously modified, so I'm not trying to cheat, just for experimental purposes only.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-19-2006, 01:06 PM
srjunkacct srjunkacct is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 493
Default Re: Loading a bat

I don't think changing the mass of the bat will really affect anything. The momentum you supply to the bat will still remain the same. I guess if you're playing fast-pitch softball, it might help to be able to get the bat around the plate quicker. I don't really know, as I've never played hardball or fast-pitch softball.

The factor that would add distance would be if you could improve the elasticity of the bat. I don't think you could really improve upon it by "corking" or "loading" it, but I could be wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-19-2006, 01:31 PM
vhawk01 vhawk01 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: GHoFFANMWYD
Posts: 9,098
Default Re: Loading a bat

Ok, what distance are the fences in your softball games? 220? Maybe 250-275 to center? If you can't hit a softball 250 feet with an aluminum softball bat, corking it cannot help you. Actually, I dont even think you can cork an aluminum bat...its already a trampoline.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-19-2006, 02:33 PM
atrifix atrifix is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 388
Default Re: Loading a bat

I would imagine that it's actually harder to hit home runs with an aluminum bat, because the ball doesn't hang in the air as long. But I could be wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-19-2006, 02:53 PM
soko soko is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Headed out west...
Posts: 2,443
Default Re: Loading a bat

[ QUOTE ]
I don't think changing the mass of the bat will really affect anything. The momentum you supply to the bat will still remain the same.

[/ QUOTE ]

Gravity is helping you swing the bat, more mass is more momentum
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-19-2006, 03:13 PM
srjunkacct srjunkacct is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 493
Default Re: Loading a bat

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I don't think changing the mass of the bat will really affect anything. The momentum you supply to the bat will still remain the same.

[/ QUOTE ]

Gravity is helping you swing the bat, more mass is more momentum

[/ QUOTE ]

1. Gravity will only help if one swings the bat down on the ball, which I'm pretty sure nobody does.

2. More mass * lower bat speed => the amount of momentum that one imparts to the bat will remain the same. What matters is how much of this momentum is transferred to the ball upon contact.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-19-2006, 03:32 PM
atrifix atrifix is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 388
Default Re: Loading a bat

It all depends on where you add the mass, what kind of material you use, etc. The bat isn't making a head-on collision with the ball. As a general rule of thumb, I think less mass is more optimal, because it increases the speed with which you swing the bat. Of course, if you can keep up the same swing speed with a heavier bat, using the heavier bat is better.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-19-2006, 03:37 PM
vhawk01 vhawk01 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: GHoFFANMWYD
Posts: 9,098
Default Re: Loading a bat

Well, the idea is that you can get more bat speed, and that the fences arent very long. Sure, it might be easier to hit a 400 ft blast with a wooden bat than an aluminum one (although I don't really see why this would be true) but its way easier to hit the ball 270 ft consistently with an aluminum bat.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-19-2006, 03:47 PM
srjunkacct srjunkacct is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 493
Default Re: Loading a bat

[ QUOTE ]
It all depends on where you add the mass, what kind of material you use, etc. The bat isn't making a head-on collision with the ball. As a general rule of thumb, I think less mass is more optimal, because it increases the speed with which you swing the bat. Of course, if you can keep up the same swing speed with a heavier bat, using the heavier bat is better.

[/ QUOTE ]

Bat speed and bat mass by themselves do not matter (except for the bit about getting around the plate quickly, i.e. swinging the bat quickly enough to hit the ball flush instead of hitting a foul ball). Momentum, which is the combination of the two, does matter. And the momentum that you supply to the bat (or, more accurately, to the combination of bat and body) is basically a function only of your legs pushing off the ground, assuming that you have an efficient swing that doesn't have any hitches.

The material, mass distribution of the bat, etc. all can be encapsulated in the elasticity factor, but I find it hard to believe that one would improve significantly over a well-designed aluminum bat. I would guess that if one hollowed out the bat, filled it up with some other substance, and then recapped it, the seam between the aluminum and the foreign matter would decrease the bat's elasticity.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.