Its not a suckout!

[jhall23]

I think it is probably good for the games for players to view these as suckouts. Once they start analyzing hands based on when the money goes in they are starting to think better. Therefore I fully support VVP to continue with his stupid comments.

[Gorby]

But a suck out really is when your a major favorite to win the hand. I agree with the tough beat comment on this.

[AliasMrJones]

The correct term would be a "re-suck".

[jhodges]

[ QUOTE ]
The correct term for this thread would be a "re-suck".

[/ QUOTE ]
FYP

[Burdzthewurd]

I call it "The Justice Card"

[THEOSU]

at that moment in time, it was a suckout. From distance, it was not at all - it was the resolution of a coinflip, that's all.

[KSOT]

AQ beating 44 wouldn't be a suckout anyway. There are no suckouts in coinflips.

[bwana devil]

[ QUOTE ]
AQ beating 44 wouldn't be a suckout anyway. There are no suckouts in coinflips.

[/ QUOTE ]

the comment was made in regards to a set of fours beating a pair.

bwana

[ChuckyB]

[ QUOTE ]
yes it is a suckout. The money got in on the right side of the coinflip, but then to win the hand on the river the guy with 44 had to suckout against AQ. If someone gets pissed at the other for "sucking out" on him this would be stupid, but the announcers aren't 100% wrong.

[/ QUOTE ]


The only reason you think this is a suckout is because of the "dramatic" way they deal out the cards. If they just turned up all five cards at the same time it would be a standard 52/48 beat.

When all the money goes in before the flop, a pre-flop favorite can't suck out.

[rageotones]

dude, so i'm all in before the flop with 72o and the guy in the BB calls me with Aces. 7 comes on the flop, and then a 7 on the turn gives me trips. then bam, the douchebag sucks out on me by hitting an A on the river.

/end proving how dumb this scenario sounds