WPT 5/10 World Poker Open

[CaseS87]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Horrible ruling by floorman there. I've only played at a few casinos but I didn't think "verbal bets are binding" was a house rule. Scotty should have to put in at least the mininum raise. (I can't believe I actually agreed with Sexton on something.)

[/ QUOTE ]


I missed it, did she actually rule that Scotty could just fold?

[/ QUOTE ]

no he just called the bet

[sambo]

no, he put in whatever it was to call and said raise and started to get more chips out and then grinder fipped his hand over. (i feel like i'm talking about a sandwich)

[WhiskyRiver]

What a horrible ruling.

[GeniusToad]

[ QUOTE ]
Did anybody else think Raul looked like DeNiro in Taxi Driver?

[/ QUOTE ]

VVP made the Travis Bickle reference at least once. definitely a resemblance but the fauxhawk and glasses helped a lot.

[Keyser.]

I'm kinda late, but I just saw it. That 56 vs. 44 hand was unreal. What happens if Grinder doesn't expose his cards?

Scotty raises, Grinder obviously goes all-in. Does Scotty auto-call here? I mean, no way Grinder puts 3-bets in on the river with two or pair something. I'd really like to know how that hand would've played out.

[TheMainEvent]

[ QUOTE ]
I'm kinda late, but I just saw it. That 56 vs. 44 hand was unreal. What happens if Grinder doesn't expose his cards?

Scotty raises, Grinder obviously goes all-in. Does Scotty auto-call here? I mean, no way Grinder puts 3-bets in on the river with two or pair something. I'd really like to know how that hand would've played out.

[/ QUOTE ]

No way Scotty folds. Both of their hands were ultra-disguised, it's very unlikely that Grinder would have played the way he did earlier in the hand with a higher set. There is no flush and the only straight possible is the one that the grinder has. I just don't see him folding here.

[JokerArmy]

[ QUOTE ]
I'm kinda late, but I just saw it. That 56 vs. 44 hand was unreal. What happens if Grinder doesn't expose his cards?

Scotty raises, Grinder obviously goes all-in. Does Scotty auto-call here? I mean, no way Grinder puts 3-bets in on the river with two or pair something. I'd really like to know how that hand would've played out.

[/ QUOTE ]

Who's to say Scotty wouldn't have pushed if it wasn't for the mistake that occured.

Not that it matters now, all things being equal Scotty's TOAST. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

- JokerArmy

[Keyser.]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm kinda late, but I just saw it. That 56 vs. 44 hand was unreal. What happens if Grinder doesn't expose his cards?

Scotty raises, Grinder obviously goes all-in. Does Scotty auto-call here? I mean, no way Grinder puts 3-bets in on the river with two or pair something. I'd really like to know how that hand would've played out.

[/ QUOTE ]

No way Scotty folds. Both of their hands were ultra-disguised, it's very unlikely that Grinder would have played the way he did earlier in the hand with a higher set. There is no flush and the only straight possible is the one that the grinder has. I just don't see him folding here.

[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah, I don't really think Scotty folds, I just think it'd be interesting to see if Scotty beats him into the pot. I mean, what else would Grinder have that he would bet flop, check turn, then bet and raise a check-raise on the river? A 3 was the last card IIRC, so maybe a set of threes.