Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71  
Old 07-31-2005, 10:07 PM
cogger cogger is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 57
Default Re: Not!

Greg - The largest buy in I should have stated. It was a 50k sit n go with 11 players. Has anyone seen this event on TV.
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 07-31-2005, 10:17 PM
Matt24 Matt24 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Brownstown, Indiana
Posts: 2,059
Default Re: Not!

it wasnt on tv.
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 07-31-2005, 10:28 PM
cogger cogger is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 57
Default Re: Not!

[ QUOTE ]
it wasnt on tv.

[/ QUOTE ]

in your area it was not. Only out west
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old 08-01-2005, 05:44 AM
CaptSensible CaptSensible is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sherman Oaks, Ca. USA
Posts: 472
Default Re: Not!

[ QUOTE ]
I have no need to do anything, except be true to myself and take care of my family.


[/ QUOTE ]
Well Said.
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old 08-01-2005, 06:04 AM
CaptSensible CaptSensible is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sherman Oaks, Ca. USA
Posts: 472
Default Re: Not!

Not everyone gets off on a challange. I have a lot of respect for someone who says "I have no need to do anything, except be true to myself and take care of my family ".

Personally, I play poker because It's fun and I like making the money. If I can keep getting better at it ie; making more money, then I'm happy. I don't feel a need to prove myself to other players or even myself for that matter.

I've never been a particularly competitive person. This might sound odd but to me poker is about playing the best game I can. It's not so much about beating the other players as it is staying on top of my game. In order to make money I have to beat other players. That's just how the game works. I get my enjoyment from winning the money not beating another player. That may make sense to some, not to others.

As long as I'm having a good time and making cash I'm good. I'll either get better at the game or I won't, in which case I'll play only occasionally for fun.

If I'd won 4 million dollars winning the wsop I wouldn't feel the need to play a 50k buy in just "for the challenge" or to prove how good I am.

Anyhow there's a luck factor involved. In the Morongo 400k tourney, superstars of poker I think it's called, I saw Doyle Brunson with two pair AQ get knocked out by a set of 9s caught on the river. Does that mean the guy that beat him is a better player? To me it doesn't necissarily mean he's better. It means he got lucky on the river.

The Plaza tourney is one tourney. If someone doesn't feel like playing in it then that's all I take from it.

Just my plain old humble opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #76  
Old 08-01-2005, 10:04 AM
kleos kleos is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: titty bar
Posts: 149
Default Re: Not!

[ QUOTE ]
I can't fathom people doing things solely for money.

[/ QUOTE ]
wow, of all the stuf that got quoted and made fun of this never got touched?!?!?! I though the WPT forum was better than that...
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old 08-01-2005, 10:42 AM
betgo betgo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 15,430
Default Re: Not!

[ QUOTE ]
Greg - The largest buy in I should have stated. It was a 50k sit n go with 11 players. Has anyone seen this event on TV.

[/ QUOTE ]

When was this played? Where are the results? Who played in it?

Wow they really did make it like the very early WSOP. With some promotion and satellites, they probably could have gotten atleast 100 even at $50K.
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old 08-01-2005, 11:35 AM
fnurt fnurt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,929
Default Re: Not!

This is an awesome thread.

It's always fun when people show up and weigh in on a months-old discussion as if it was still going on.

But the best part is the passion with which this argument raged for pages, at the end of which we learn that the tournament where Greg Raymer tragically disdained a chance to prove that he is the best actually attracted only 11 people. At least 3 of whom were family members. You can't make this stuff up.

Greg might not rethink his decision to avoid this tournament, but I bet he would like to take back his prediction that it would not be significantly +EV for him.
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old 08-01-2005, 12:02 PM
betgo betgo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 15,430
Default Re: Not!

[ QUOTE ]
attracted only 11 people. At least 3 of whom were family members.

[/ QUOTE ]

Where do you get this information?
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Old 08-01-2005, 12:15 PM
Kevmath Kevmath is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Syracuse
Posts: 8,656
Default Re: Not!

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
attracted only 11 people. At least 3 of whom were family members.

[/ QUOTE ]

Where do you get this information?

[/ QUOTE ]

http://www.pokerpages.com/tournament/result11400.htm

Kevin...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.