#1
|
|||
|
|||
Reformed Users
So Roundmound, and I don't know what he posted under before that, has been posting again. However, he's been far less trollish and basically reasonable, at least for the time being.
Is it worth rebanning, or does one give him a second (third? fourth?) chance. How does this fit into the New OOT? I especially would like to hear what the 3 new mods think. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Reformed Users
I was never banned and I have quit drinking.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Reformed Users
You should've been.
You've been much better, I'd just kill this account and keep the new one. Still, it's a legitimate question to ask given the number of users that come back repeatedly. Dead's a great example, but there are others. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Reformed Users
Are Stat Boy and Roundmound the same?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Reformed Users
Clark,
I generally try and judge each account differently. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Reformed Users
Yes, and Clark I probably should have been banned.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Reformed Users
Moving the thread is fine, but I think it's better to leave the "moved to" thing in the initial foum. It can't be replied to and drops off fast, but helps those reading it to know where it went rather than trying to hunt it down.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Reformed Users
Clark,
it was accident to not have the pointer. I thought the pointer was default and didn't realize I actually have to check a box for that. Sorry for the confusion. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Reformed Users
oh, no biggie. Just an opinion on the pointer (didn't know the term).
I think I agree with regard to case by case. But I'd have a real real fast trigger once an identified revived poster starts getting even a little retarded again. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Reformed Users
Is anybody else seeing this thread listed has having 7(8) replies? Probably 8(9) now that I've responded.
|
|
|