|
|
#12
04-24-2006, 08:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: very unusual QJo hand
[ QUOTE ]
So loose passive doesn't imply that he can have us crushed ? I thought that meant he didn't raise much. So one loose passive, one unknown, and one donk. Still doesn't seem that clear cut to me. [/ QUOTE ] He's loose so it's not likely that he has us beat. It also means that he won't extract the most from us when he does. If he was considered tight/passive, then there might be an issue to discuss. 
|
|
#14
04-24-2006, 09:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: very unusual QJo hand
I think you played it fine, you are good here often enough to call the river.
|
|
#15
04-24-2006, 09:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: very unusual QJo hand
[ QUOTE ]
Do I have a leak in my game if I fold that preflop ? [/ QUOTE ] I wouldn't call it a leak. QJo is a limp and Q10o and J10o are folds for me. All three are very borderline hands and probably don't make too much difference. But I definitely think you should play QJo anyway.
|
|
#18
04-25-2006, 05:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: very unusual QJo hand
I like the way this hand was played.
rafiki, Getting involved with position against bad players with OK hands is +EV, If you play decently, your definately losing value by not playing this.
|
|
#19
04-25-2006, 10:28 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: very unusual QJo hand
ok this is good to know. Can you guys let me know which of these hands in the dealer spot, in this exact same situation, I should fold ?
A8 A7 K8s J9s 56s 89s just trying to get a feel for what plays well in that spot vs bad players
|
|
#20
04-25-2006, 10:33 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: very unusual QJo hand
Offsuit aces I would much rather isolate one bad player than play against a large field. The suited hands I'm overlimping against a large field. J9s and 89s are good calls in this situation, K8s is pretty borderline I think.
Just look at the SSH "tight" reccomendations, they still apply to mid-stakes games with volume pots and bad players.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
