Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-17-2006, 04:08 PM
cantsitstillbr cantsitstillbr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,460
Default Strangly played QQ agaisnt a set miner.

SB is one of those 8/2 type guys over not too many hands. If I had to guess he is probably one of those set miners.

BB is really shortstacked and loose passive.



100NL 6max on party

I($118) get QQ utg+1.

UTG folds, I raise to $3, folded to sb($104) who calls, BB($15) calls.

Flop($9):
J [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]2 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]5 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]

Check, check, I bet $6, SB calls, BB folds.

Turn($21):
9 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]

Check, I check behind

River($21):
4 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]

SB bets $8, I raise to $22
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-17-2006, 04:12 PM
Heine Heine is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Midland
Posts: 684
Default Re: Strangly played QQ agaisnt a set miner.

I like to make a closer to pot sized bet here on the flop. If it is a set miner do you have any idea how he plays his sets?

If thats the case I would 2/3Pot bet the turn and check and call any normal bet on the river.

Then again i'm kind of new, anyone else agree with my advice?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-17-2006, 04:33 PM
KingOfSwords KingOfSwords is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NL130
Posts: 618
Default Re: Strangly played QQ agaisnt a set miner.

He either tried to slowplay a set and got frustrated and bet out the turn, or he took your turn check as weakness after a missed continuation bet and is betting out to try and take it down. I'd just call the river.

I think 2/3 pot on the flop is fine...my preference is pot-sized or close to it, but I don't think it's something that makes or breaks this hand.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-17-2006, 04:45 PM
23act 23act is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 403
Default Re: Strangly played QQ agaisnt a set miner.

i would bet the turn at about 1/2 pot. size of bet needs to be big enough to give u information about his hand, but not big enough to push out draws (since they aren't likely).

if he calls, i would be wary on the river.

if he raises, i'd consider if this guy has seen u push others off at the turn and whether he may be putting u on nothing or something weak. without a read, i would fold.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-17-2006, 04:47 PM
quarkncover quarkncover is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Quark\'s Bar
Posts: 3,210
Default Re: Strangly played QQ agaisnt a set miner.

Raising this river is really bad and I think you probably realized it as soon as you clicked raise [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-17-2006, 04:48 PM
Dan Bitel Dan Bitel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bork! Bork! Bork!
Posts: 11,164
Default Re: Strangly played QQ agaisnt a set miner.

raise more preflop.

whats with the river raise??? You say he's a set miner, he calls a flop bet on a COMPLETELY drawless board, he bets out the river, and you raise for value??
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-17-2006, 04:51 PM
Hoopster81 Hoopster81 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: between the click of the light and the start of the dream
Posts: 3,648
Default Re: Strangly played QQ agaisnt a set miner.

[ QUOTE ]
Raising this river is really bad and I think you probably realized it as soon as you clicked raise

[/ QUOTE ]

I disagree

That punish river bet by villain looks like he's trying to get some value from his top pair. I have to believe he would bet a set stronger here. I like the river raise and folding to re-raise.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-17-2006, 05:01 PM
cantsitstillbr cantsitstillbr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,460
Default Re: Strangly played QQ agaisnt a set miner.

[ QUOTE ]

That punish river bet by villain looks like he's trying to get some value from his top pair. I have to believe he would bet a set stronger here. I like the river raise and folding to re-raise.

[/ QUOTE ]

My exact thoughts
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-17-2006, 05:01 PM
strunks strunks is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 30
Default Re: Strangly played QQ agaisnt a set miner.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Raising this river is really bad and I think you probably realized it as soon as you clicked raise

[/ QUOTE ]

I disagree

That punish river bet by villain looks like he's trying to get some value from his top pair. I have to believe he would bet a set stronger here. I like the river raise and folding to re-raise.

[/ QUOTE ]

If he's betting his top pair for value, do you think he would call the river raise or fold to it?

I would think the only times he will call is if he has better than top pair. So raising only makes you win the min and lose the max.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-17-2006, 05:03 PM
amoeba amoeba is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,353
Default Re: Strangly played QQ agaisnt a set miner.

i think this hand is played fine.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.