#1
|
|||
|
|||
Playing Small Pocket Pairs from Early Position
<font color="blue">In a loose game, from early position, against a raise, should you play a small pockt pair; say 22-66? [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img]
I'd really appreciate y'alls help to see if I'm playing it right or not. Thanks.</font> KE |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Playing Small Pocket Pairs from Early Position
Generally not, but that dependson how loose the game is and how many players already been coldcalling/limping.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Playing Small Pocket Pairs from Early Position
this isn't exactly what you are asking, but i notice that these smaller pairs do better in loose-aggressive games with lots of action on the flop. they are great for loose-passive games, but when you flop a set in a loose-aggressive game you are ensured of decent action most of the time, which means more bets in the pot. as for your question, if you are asking if i am the first coldcaller of an UTG raise with those hands in UTG+1/UTG+2/Early MP, almost always no(of course there are a few exceptions to these situations).
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Playing Small Pocket Pairs from Early Position
first of all, i think it's awesome that you can vote for 2. second play them in live games no matter what. third if it's loose agro before flop--forget about it you want loose agro post flop.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Playing Small Pocket Pairs from Early Position
[ QUOTE ]
if it's loose agro before flop--forget about it you want loose agro post flop. [/ QUOTE ] one is usually a result of the other, no? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Playing Small Pocket Pairs from Early Position
If you think there is a VERY good chance of it being at least a 4 or 5 handed pot, then they are probably worth playing. Any less, muck them except vs. complete maniacs
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Playing Small Pocket Pairs from Early Position
heh, even in TIGHT games, i sometimes OPEN RAISE with 22-66 (full ring) from ANY position and usually knock out all but one (sometimes two) opponents who will (usually) fold to a c-bet.
i only do this though when i'm winning a lot of pots. of course, when you're sitting there for 4 hours and have not won a single hand, you might not want to do this... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Playing Small Pocket Pairs from Early Position
Quantify 'Loose'. There are spots for these.
JT |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Playing Small Pocket Pairs from Early Position
Loose: Usually 6 to the Flop. And I'm talking hoping to catch trips and if not letting them go?
KE |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Playing Small Pocket Pairs from Early Position
one of the biggest things i've noticed about 5/10 and 10/20 is that people overvalue small and even medium pocket pairs in a lot of situations.
i constantly see people 3-betting with these against tight raisers. i had a guy with TAG stats call 3 cold with 88. he made it to showdown despite 2 overcards and won against an UI AK. the funny thing is that since he won i'm betting he things this was a good play and is patting himself on the back. |
|
|