#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Lil Overbet nl100
villian had TT
Your assuming I was beat? Did you not read/comprehend any of my logic? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Lil Overbet nl100
Not trying to come off as a dick, but meh.
I didn't post this hand because I thought I was beat. I posted it because I wanted thoughts about the overbet on the 45/15 player. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Lil Overbet nl100
Fair enough. It's not a play I would have made but seeing how it paid off that may be an error on my part.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Lil Overbet nl100
I would make villain's play with AA/KK 9 out of 10 times. You got lucky IMO.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Lil Overbet nl100
good to see that you are a losing player then
45/15 ftw eh |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Lil Overbet nl100
ipot, your logic about his range is fine.
With that said, 35-45/call shove is still better |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Lil Overbet nl100
[ QUOTE ]
I would make villain's play with AA/KK 9 out of 10 times. You got lucky IMO. [/ QUOTE ] Min-re-raise preflop? You must be good. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Lil Overbet nl100
Overbets are good when they induce calls because opponents think youre FOS. Here villian clearly thinks his TT is good anyway and youd get the same results if you bet 2/3rd-full pot.
I agree w/ your range comments pf. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Lil Overbet nl100
what specifically about him being 45/15 made you think that an overbet would play out like this?
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Lil Overbet nl100
If you are going to overbet, I like an open-shove much better. I agree with 35/call shove though.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|